Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLYCX vs CGFAX
BLYCX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BLYCX vs CGFAX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Growth C
Price$30.91
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.64M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
BLYCX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLYCX vs. CGFAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLYCX is a StrongBuy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. BLYCX (200M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BLYCX: CGFAX (0.32) vs BLYCX (0.00). BLYCX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BLYCX (10 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BLYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). BLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLYCX: CGFAX (250) vs BLYCX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. BLYCX (-2.00). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. BLYCX (-6.28).
| BLYCX | CGFAX | BLYCX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.65 | 282% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.65 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.190 | 14.270 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.00 | 14.57 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.23 | 42.81 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.28 | 44.65 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement