BLX
Price
$40.83
Change
+$0.47 (+1.16%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
23 days until earnings call
MCHB
Price
$41000.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLX vs MCHB

Header iconBLX vs MCHB Comparison
Open Charts BLX vs MCHBBanner chart's image
Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior SA
Price$40.83
Change+$0.47 (+1.16%)
Volume$55.78K
Capitalization1.09B
Mechanics Bank of Richmond (CA)
Price$41000.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6
Capitalization1.49B
BLX vs MCHB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLX vs. MCHB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLX is a Hold and MCHB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BLX: $40.83 vs. MCHB: $41000.00)
Brand notoriety: BLX and MCHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLX: 49% vs. MCHB: 234%
Market capitalization -- BLX: $1.09B vs. MCHB: $1.49B
BLX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.09B. MCHB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BLX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLX is a better buy in the long-term than MCHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCHB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHB is a better buy in the short-term than BLX.

Price Growth

BLX (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.04% price change this week, while MCHB (@Regional Banks) price change was +12.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLX is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHB($1.49B) has a higher market cap than BLX($1.09B). MCHB (6.88) and BLX (6.56) have similar P/E ratio . MCHB YTD gains are higher at: 54.717 vs. BLX (18.461). MCHB has higher revenues than BLX: MCHB (692M) vs BLX (221M).
BLXMCHBBLX / MCHB
Capitalization1.09B1.49B73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.46154.71734%
P/E Ratio6.566.8895%
Revenue221M692M32%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A101M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLX vs MCHB: Fundamental Ratings
BLX
MCHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
1712
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
352
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLX's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHB (94) in the null industry. This means that BLX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BLX (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCHB’s stock grew similarly to BLX’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BLX (17) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCHB’s stock grew similarly to BLX’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BLX (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCHB’s stock grew similarly to BLX’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLX (35) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLXMCHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
42%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FZROX21.830.18
+0.83%
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index
PAGRX122.550.93
+0.76%
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth I
SIBLX29.250.14
+0.48%
Touchstone Balanced Y
IFTSX12.78N/A
N/A
Voya International High Div Low Vol S
MXINX14.95-0.01
-0.07%
Empower International Index Inv

BLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLX has been loosely correlated with ONB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLX jumps, then ONB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLX
1D Price
Change %
BLX100%
+1.16%
ONB - BLX
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
WASH - BLX
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.24%
ABCB - BLX
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
WTFC - BLX
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
HWC - BLX
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
More

MCHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHB has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHB jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHB
1D Price
Change %
MCHB100%
N/A
GPFOF - MCHB
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OSBK - MCHB
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLX - MCHB
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
FBPA - MCHB
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
LSFG - MCHB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More