BLVDF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.02 (-28.57%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.33M
CFNCF
Price
$146.65
Change
+$12.65 (+9.44%)
Updated
Apr 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLVDF vs CFNCF

Header iconBLVDF vs CFNCF Comparison
Open Charts BLVDF vs CFNCFBanner chart's image
GlobalBlock Digital Asset Trading
Price$0.05
Change-$0.02 (-28.57%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization4.33M
Cie Financiere Tradition Lausanne ACT
Price$146.65
Change+$12.65 (+9.44%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.6B
BLVDF vs CFNCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLVDF vs. CFNCF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLVDF is a Hold and CFNCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BLVDF: $0.05 vs. CFNCF: $146.65)
Brand notoriety: BLVDF and CFNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLVDF: 45% vs. CFNCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BLVDF: $4.33M vs. CFNCF: $2.6B
BLVDF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.33M. CFNCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLVDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCFNCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLVDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CFNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFNCF is a better buy in the long-term than BLVDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLVDF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BLVDF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BLVDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CFNCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFNCF($2.6B) has a higher market cap than BLVDF($4.33M). BLVDF has higher P/E ratio than CFNCF: BLVDF (35.90) vs CFNCF (10.74). CFNCF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BLVDF (-30.556). CFNCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 199M vs. BLVDF (-432.68K). CFNCF has more cash in the bank: 479M vs. BLVDF (786K). CFNCF has higher revenues than BLVDF: CFNCF (1.1B) vs BLVDF (0).
BLVDFCFNCFBLVDF / CFNCF
Capitalization4.33M2.6B0%
EBITDA-432.68K199M-0%
Gain YTD-30.5560.000-
P/E Ratio35.9010.74334%
Revenue01.1B-
Total Cash786K479M0%
Total DebtN/A353M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLVDF vs CFNCF: Fundamental Ratings
BLVDF
CFNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
9833
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9572
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1636
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFNCF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLVDF (83). This means that CFNCF’s stock grew significantly faster than BLVDF’s over the last 12 months.

CFNCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLVDF (100). This means that CFNCF’s stock grew significantly faster than BLVDF’s over the last 12 months.

CFNCF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLVDF (98). This means that CFNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLVDF’s over the last 12 months.

CFNCF's Price Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as BLVDF (95). This means that CFNCF’s stock grew similarly to BLVDF’s over the last 12 months.

BLVDF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CFNCF (36). This means that BLVDF’s stock grew similarly to CFNCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLVDFCFNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JFNCX58.180.71
+1.24%
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences C
BOSOX17.410.20
+1.16%
Boston Trust Walden Small Cap
VSCPX352.543.39
+0.97%
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
TMCLX9.000.05
+0.56%
Transamerica Energy Infrastructure C
LICPX17.970.09
+0.50%
Lord Abbett International Equity P

BLVDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLVDF has been loosely correlated with BOMXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLVDF jumps, then BOMXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLVDF
1D Price
Change %
BLVDF100%
N/A
BOMXF - BLVDF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
CCORF - BLVDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
BBKCF - BLVDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
CGXYY - BLVDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFNCF - BLVDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CFNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFNCF and BTCWF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFNCF and BTCWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFNCF
1D Price
Change %
CFNCF100%
N/A
BTCWF - CFNCF
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.48%
CIIHF - CFNCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLVDF - CFNCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKBLF - CFNCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGXYY - CFNCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More