BLVDF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 2 closing price
Capitalization
15.14M
CCORF
Price
$8.00
Change
-$0.16 (-1.96%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
623.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLVDF vs CCORF

Header iconBLVDF vs CCORF Comparison
Open Charts BLVDF vs CCORFBanner chart's image
GlobalBlock Digital Asset Trading
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization15.14M
Canaccord Genuity Group
Price$8.00
Change-$0.16 (-1.96%)
Volume$100
Capitalization623.61M
BLVDF vs CCORF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLVDF vs. CCORF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLVDF is a Hold and CCORF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BLVDF: $0.07 vs. CCORF: $8.00)
Brand notoriety: BLVDF and CCORF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLVDF: 100% vs. CCORF: 1%
Market capitalization -- BLVDF: $15.14M vs. CCORF: $623.61M
BLVDF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $15.14M. CCORF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $623.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLVDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCORF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLVDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CCORF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCORF is a better buy in the long-term than BLVDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLVDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCORF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLVDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • CCORF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BLVDF and CCORF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BLVDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CCORF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCORF($624M) has a higher market cap than BLVDF($15.1M). BLVDF has higher P/E ratio than CCORF: BLVDF (16.78) vs CCORF (10.94). CCORF YTD gains are higher at: 13.879 vs. BLVDF (3.889). CCORF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 88.1M vs. BLVDF (-468.67K). CCORF has more cash in the bank: 1.72B vs. BLVDF (112K). CCORF has higher revenues than BLVDF: CCORF (1.51B) vs BLVDF (0).
BLVDFCCORFBLVDF / CCORF
Capitalization15.1M624M2%
EBITDA-468.67K88.1M-1%
Gain YTD3.88913.87928%
P/E Ratio16.7810.94153%
Revenue01.51B-
Total Cash112K1.72B0%
Total DebtN/A434M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLVDF vs CCORF: Fundamental Ratings
BLVDF
CCORF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
9890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1758
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5517

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCORF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLVDF (79). This means that CCORF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLVDF’s over the last 12 months.

CCORF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLVDF (100). This means that CCORF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLVDF’s over the last 12 months.

CCORF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as BLVDF (98). This means that CCORF’s stock grew similarly to BLVDF’s over the last 12 months.

CCORF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BLVDF (75). This means that CCORF’s stock grew similarly to BLVDF’s over the last 12 months.

BLVDF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCORF (58). This means that BLVDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLVDFCCORF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANDC18.90N/A
N/A
Andover Bancorp, Inc.
SWSSF2.00N/A
N/A
Swiss Wtr Decaffinated Coffee Inc.
NXLLF1.65N/A
N/A
NUIX LTD
IFJPY23.88-0.45
-1.87%
Informa Plc.
TMVWY5.45-0.20
-3.49%
TeamViewer SE

BLVDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLVDF has been loosely correlated with BOMXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLVDF jumps, then BOMXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLVDF
1D Price
Change %
BLVDF100%
N/A
BOMXF - BLVDF
37%
Loosely correlated
-5.40%
CCORF - BLVDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBKCF - BLVDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
CGXYY - BLVDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFNCF - BLVDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CCORF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCORF and MQBKY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCORF and MQBKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCORF
1D Price
Change %
CCORF100%
N/A
MQBKY - CCORF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
DMGGF - CCORF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
NRSCF - CCORF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.81%
NPPTF - CCORF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
XAUMF - CCORF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
More