BLUW
Price
$9.97
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 11, 11:56 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
313.26M
EMCGU
Price
$12.80
Change
+$0.80 (+6.67%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLUW vs EMCGU

Header iconBLUW vs EMCGU Comparison
Open Charts BLUW vs EMCGUBanner chart's image
Blue Water Acquisition Corp III
Price$9.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization313.26M
Embrace Change Acquisition
Price$12.80
Change+$0.80 (+6.67%)
Volume$5.18K
CapitalizationN/A
BLUW vs EMCGU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMCGU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLUW vs. EMCGU commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLUW is a Hold and EMCGU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BLUW: $9.97 vs. EMCGU: $12.80)
Brand notoriety: BLUW and EMCGU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLUW: 70% vs. EMCGU: 979%
Market capitalization -- BLUW: $313.26M vs. EMCGU: $0
BLUW [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $313.26M. EMCGU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $163.89M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLUW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEMCGU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLUW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EMCGU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMCGU is a better buy in the long-term than BLUW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMCGU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EMCGU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

BLUW (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while EMCGU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +5.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.04% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLUWEMCGUBLUW / EMCGU
Capitalization313MN/A-
EBITDAN/A1.05M-
Gain YTDN/A9.402-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A17.2K-
Total DebtN/A907K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMCGU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMCGU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OFLX32.480.37
+1.15%
Omega Flex
DYNXU11.980.13
+1.10%
Dynamix Corp.
QRVO88.090.54
+0.62%
Qorvo
ACMR23.94-0.33
-1.36%
ACM Research
BWEN2.38-0.23
-8.81%
Broadwind

BLUW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLUW and QETAU have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLUW and QETAU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLUW
1D Price
Change %
BLUW100%
+0.10%
QETAU - BLUW
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KVACU - BLUW
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASPCU - BLUW
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCGU - BLUW
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.67%
SIMA - BLUW
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
More

EMCGU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMCGU has been loosely correlated with SIMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMCGU jumps, then SIMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMCGU
1D Price
Change %
EMCGU100%
+6.67%
SIMA - EMCGU
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
GIG - EMCGU
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - EMCGU
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCG - EMCGU
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
GIGGU - EMCGU
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More