Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLUEX vs NLSIX
BLUEX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts BLUEX vs NLSIX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return I
Price$40.40
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.26M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.69
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.52B
BLUEX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLUEX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLUEX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.52B vs. BLUEX (101M). BLUEX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: BLUEX (0.27) vs NLSIX (0.02). BLUEX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: BLUEX (35 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). NLSIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than BLUEX (1.24). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BLUEX (33.00). BLUEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: BLUEX (2000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. BLUEX (7.61). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.31 vs. BLUEX (-20.94).
| BLUEX | NLSIX | BLUEX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.32 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.881 | 5.013 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 7.52B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.02 | 1,292% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 10.52 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.63 | 19.29 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.94 | 29.31 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.73 | 54.43 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers