Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLUEX vs NLSCX
BLUEX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BLUEX vs NLSCX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return I
Price$39.85
Change+$0.18 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.74M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.78
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
BLUEX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLUEX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLUEX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.83B vs. BLUEX (98.7M). BLUEX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BLUEX (0.27) vs NLSCX (0.00). BLUEX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BLUEX (35 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BLUEX (1.24). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BLUEX (33.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLUEX: NLSCX (1000) vs BLUEX (2000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.81 vs. BLUEX (0.51). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.85 vs. BLUEX (-25.53).
| BLUEX | NLSCX | BLUEX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 2.43 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.43 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.453 | 6.162 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.7M | 7.83B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.51 | 7.81 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.55 | 20.92 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.53 | 19.85 | -129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.15 | 48.27 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers