Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLUEX vs NLSAX
BLUEX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BLUEX vs NLSAX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return I
Price$40.08
Change-$0.42 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.42M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.93
Change-$0.13 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.37B
BLUEX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLUEX vs. NLSAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLUEX is a StrongBuy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.37B vs. BLUEX (101M). BLUEX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BLUEX (0.28) vs NLSAX (0.00). BLUEX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BLUEX (34 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). NLSAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than BLUEX (1.24). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BLUEX (33.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLUEX: NLSAX (1000) vs BLUEX (2000). BLUEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. NLSAX (7.01). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.60 vs. BLUEX (-14.34).
| BLUEX | NLSAX | BLUEX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.68 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.68 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.050 | 2.546 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 7.37B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.95 | 7.01 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.28 | 18.49 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.34 | 27.60 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.05 | 43.02 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement