Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLUEX vs NLSAX
BLUEX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BLUEX vs NLSAX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return I
Price$40.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.42M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.22
Change+$0.08 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.45B
BLUEX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLUEX vs. NLSAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLUEX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.45B vs. BLUEX (102M). BLUEX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BLUEX (0.27) vs NLSAX (0.00). BLUEX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BLUEX (35 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). NLSAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than BLUEX (1.24). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BLUEX (33.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLUEX: NLSAX (1000) vs BLUEX (2000). BLUEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.09 vs. NLSAX (8.16). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.51 vs. BLUEX (-17.46).
| BLUEX | NLSAX | BLUEX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.68 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.68 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.789 | 4.117 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 102M | 7.45B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.09 | 8.16 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.75 | 18.11 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.46 | 27.51 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.22 | 46.89 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement