BLTMF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
NCAUF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

BLTMF vs NCAUF

Header iconBLTMF vs NCAUF Comparison
Open Charts BLTMF vs NCAUFBanner chart's image
Orbec Gold Mines
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Newcore Gold
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$85.53K
CapitalizationN/A
BLTMF vs NCAUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLTMF vs. NCAUF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLTMF is a Hold and NCAUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BLTMF: $0.03 vs. NCAUF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: BLTMF and NCAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLTMF: 98% vs. NCAUF: 131%
Market capitalization -- BLTMF: $1.3M vs. NCAUF: $18.78M
BLTMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.3M. NCAUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLTMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNCAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLTMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NCAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NCAUF is a better buy in the long-term than BLTMF.

Price Growth

BLTMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NCAUF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NCAUF($18.8M) has a higher market cap than BLTMF($1.3M). NCAUF YTD gains are higher at: 114.431 vs. BLTMF (-43.443). BLTMF (-2.38M) and NCAUF (-2.4M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . NCAUF has more cash in the bank: 2.27M vs. BLTMF (490K). BLTMF (0) and NCAUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BLTMFNCAUFBLTMF / NCAUF
Capitalization1.3M18.8M7%
EBITDA-2.38M-2.4M99%
Gain YTD-43.443114.431-38%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash490K2.27M22%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCAUF: Fundamental Ratings
NCAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BLTMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLTMF has been loosely correlated with PNGZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLTMF jumps, then PNGZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLTMF
1D Price
Change %
BLTMF100%
N/A
PNGZF - BLTMF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MDSMF - BLTMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCAUF - BLTMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
RDEXF - BLTMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
CYPMF - BLTMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NCAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCAUF and BLTMF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCAUF and BLTMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCAUF
1D Price
Change %
NCAUF100%
+0.20%
BLTMF - NCAUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KUYAF - NCAUF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
HSTXF - NCAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
CGLCF - NCAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.69%
HMY - NCAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
More