BLSFY
Price
$100.00
Change
-$0.19 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
8.71B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FEEXF
Price
$0.92
Change
-$0.09 (-8.91%)
Updated
Jan 12 closing price
Capitalization
549M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLSFY vs FEEXF

Header iconBLSFY vs FEEXF Comparison
Open Charts BLSFY vs FEEXFBanner chart's image
Bluescope Steel
Price$100.00
Change-$0.19 (-0.19%)
Volume$218
Capitalization8.71B
Ferrexpo
Price$0.92
Change-$0.09 (-8.91%)
Volume$29.01K
Capitalization549M
BLSFY vs FEEXF Comparison Chart in %
BLSFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FEEXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLSFY vs. FEEXF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLSFY is a Hold and FEEXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (BLSFY: $100.00 vs. FEEXF: $0.92)
Brand notoriety: BLSFY and FEEXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLSFY: 7% vs. FEEXF: 319%
Market capitalization -- BLSFY: $8.71B vs. FEEXF: $549M
BLSFY [@Steel] is valued at $8.71B. FEEXF’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $549M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $39.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $6.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLSFY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFEEXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLSFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FEEXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLSFY is a better buy in the long-term than FEEXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLSFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FEEXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLSFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FEEXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FEEXF is a better buy in the short-term than BLSFY.

Price Growth

BLSFY (@Steel) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while FEEXF (@Steel) price change was -8.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+3.40% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLSFY($8.71B) has a higher market cap than FEEXF($549M). BLSFY has higher P/E ratio than FEEXF: BLSFY (177.89) vs FEEXF (2.17). BLSFY YTD gains are higher at: 26.582 vs. FEEXF (-19.035). BLSFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 994M vs. FEEXF (-217.71M). BLSFY has higher revenues than FEEXF: BLSFY (16.3B) vs FEEXF (837M).
BLSFYFEEXFBLSFY / FEEXF
Capitalization8.71B549M1,587%
EBITDA994M-217.71M-457%
Gain YTD26.582-19.035-140%
P/E Ratio177.892.178,206%
Revenue16.3B837M1,947%
Total CashN/A52.3M-
Total DebtN/A2.72M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLSFY vs FEEXF: Fundamental Ratings
BLSFY
FEEXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3188
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29100
SMR RATING
1..100
9197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
193
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FEEXF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BLSFY (16). This means that FEEXF’s stock grew similarly to BLSFY’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FEEXF (100). This means that BLSFY’s stock grew significantly faster than FEEXF’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as FEEXF (97). This means that BLSFY’s stock grew similarly to FEEXF’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FEEXF (50). This means that BLSFY’s stock grew similarly to FEEXF’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FEEXF (93). This means that BLSFY’s stock grew significantly faster than FEEXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLSFYFEEXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLSFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FEEXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXZ72.401.00
+1.40%
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX® ETF
BLDG25.020.13
+0.51%
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
TAXM50.540.08
+0.16%
Bondbloxx Ir+M Tax-Aware ETF For Massachusetts Residents
FJUL56.26-0.10
-0.18%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jul
AIFD37.85-0.72
-1.86%
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF

BLSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLSFY and CLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLSFY and CLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLSFY
1D Price
Change %
BLSFY100%
-0.19%
CLF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.49%
FEEXF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LIFZF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
NUE - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
CMC - BLSFY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FEEXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FEEXF and BLSFY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FEEXF and BLSFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FEEXF
1D Price
Change %
FEEXF100%
N/A
BLSFY - FEEXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
VLPNY - FEEXF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
USNZY - FEEXF
8%
Poorly correlated
+7.09%
VLOWY - FEEXF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
VLPNF - FEEXF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More