BLRDF
Price
$11.50
Change
+$0.19 (+1.68%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.12B
CFPUF
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.01 (-1.89%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
81.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLRDF vs CFPUF

Header iconBLRDF vs CFPUF Comparison
Open Charts BLRDF vs CFPUFBanner chart's image
Billerud AB
Price$11.50
Change+$0.19 (+1.68%)
Volume$5.55K
Capitalization2.12B
Canfor Pulp Products
Price$0.52
Change-$0.01 (-1.89%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization81.42M
BLRDF vs CFPUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CFPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLRDF vs. CFPUF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRDF is a Hold and CFPUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BLRDF: $11.50 vs. CFPUF: $0.52)
Brand notoriety: BLRDF and CFPUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLRDF: 157% vs. CFPUF: 36%
Market capitalization -- BLRDF: $2.12B vs. CFPUF: $81.42M
BLRDF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $2.12B. CFPUF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $81.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $17.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLRDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCFPUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLRDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CFPUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLRDF is a better buy in the long-term than CFPUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLRDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFPUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLRDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CFPUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLRDF is a better buy in the short-term than CFPUF.

Price Growth

BLRDF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CFPUF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -0.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+1.96% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLRDF($2.12B) has a higher market cap than CFPUF($81.4M). BLRDF has higher P/E ratio than CFPUF: BLRDF (9.05) vs CFPUF (7.05). BLRDF YTD gains are higher at: 25.683 vs. CFPUF (4.343). BLRDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.25B vs. CFPUF (-34.9M). BLRDF has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. CFPUF (21.1M). CFPUF has less debt than BLRDF: CFPUF (109M) vs BLRDF (8.13B). BLRDF has higher revenues than CFPUF: BLRDF (45.2B) vs CFPUF (876M).
BLRDFCFPUFBLRDF / CFPUF
Capitalization2.12B81.4M2,602%
EBITDA6.25B-34.9M-17,905%
Gain YTD25.6834.343591%
P/E Ratio9.057.05128%
Revenue45.2B876M5,160%
Total Cash1.29B21.1M6,095%
Total Debt8.13B109M7,456%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLRDF vs CFPUF: Fundamental Ratings
BLRDF
CFPUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLRDF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPUF (67). This means that BLRDF’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

BLRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPUF (100). This means that BLRDF’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

BLRDF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPUF (97). This means that BLRDF’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

BLRDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPUF (61). This means that BLRDF’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

CFPUF's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as BLRDF (100). This means that CFPUF’s stock grew similarly to BLRDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLRDFCFPUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CFPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYVFX9.960.08
+0.81%
Royce Small-Cap Value Service
GCMTX35.900.21
+0.59%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Inv
VPMAX180.760.82
+0.46%
Vanguard PRIMECAP Adm
SGGDX37.510.16
+0.43%
First Eagle Gold A
FQTEX13.360.04
+0.30%
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv

BLRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLRDF and MERC have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLRDF and MERC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLRDF
1D Price
Change %
BLRDF100%
N/A
MERC - BLRDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
CFPUF - BLRDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
KLBAY - BLRDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMPMF - BLRDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLRDY - BLRDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CFPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFPUF and UPMMY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFPUF and UPMMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFPUF
1D Price
Change %
CFPUF100%
-2.98%
UPMMY - CFPUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
KLBAY - CFPUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITP - CFPUF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
BLRDF - CFPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUZ - CFPUF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More