Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$11.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets115.9M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.31
Change+$0.16 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Buy and CSFZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. BLRCX (116M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (2.93) vs BLRCX (1.63). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.69 vs. BLRCX (3.02). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 28.17 vs. BLRCX (17.50).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.84 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.84 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.915 | 8.129 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 1.98B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 2.93 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.02 | 3.69 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.40 | 3.36 | -71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.50 | 28.17 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.78 | 44.68 | 20% |