Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$11.91
Change-$0.11 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.63M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.24
Change-$0.74 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Hold and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. BLRCX (118M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (2.84) vs BLRCX (1.18). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (14 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). BLRCX (4.47) and CSFZX (4.27) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 20.73 vs. BLRCX (12.99).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.84 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.84 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.299 | 9.981 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118M | 2.06B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 2.84 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 4.27 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.58 | 22.37 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.99 | 20.73 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.72 | 53.72 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers