Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$12.35
Change+$0.60 (+5.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.61M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.94
Change+$1.08 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a StrongBuy and CSFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. BLRCX (121M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (3.42) vs BLRCX (1.13). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (14 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). BLRCX (12.12) and CSFZX (11.74) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 19.32 vs. BLRCX (12.84).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.84 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.84 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.175 | 2.548 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121M | 2.05B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 3.42 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | 11.74 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.91 | 14.59 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.84 | 19.32 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.54 | 64.06 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement