Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSFZX
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$12.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.82M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
BLRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a StrongBuy and CSFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.12B vs. BLRCX (118M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSFZX (2.77) vs BLRCX (1.15). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRCX (14 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRCX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRCX (1000). BLRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. CSFZX (8.15). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 17.39 vs. BLRCX (12.43).
| BLRCX | CSFZX | BLRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.84 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.84 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.216 | 8.766 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118M | 2.12B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.77 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.82 | 8.15 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.23 | 22.10 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.43 | 17.39 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.05 | 47.29 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement