Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.57M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.56
Change+$0.09 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a StrongBuy and CSFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. BLRAX (113M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.89) vs BLRAX (2.32). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.94 vs. CSFZX (11.43). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.68 vs. BLRAX (24.70).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.84 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.84 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.317 | 8.627 | 85% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 1.99B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 2.89 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.94 | 11.43 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.56 | 12.89 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.70 | 33.68 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.10 | 51.83 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement