Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$12.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.93M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a StrongBuy and CSFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.12B vs. BLRAX (118M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.77) vs BLRAX (2.04). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (14 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.49 vs. CSFZX (8.31). CSFZX (17.52) and BLRAX (16.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.84 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.84 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.183 | 8.886 | 126% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118M | 2.12B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 2.77 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.49 | 8.31 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.03 | 22.11 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.89 | 17.52 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.94 | 45.70 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement