Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.72
Change-$0.11 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.86M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.50
Change-$0.41 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a Buy and CSFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. BLRAX (112M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.67) vs BLRAX (2.06). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.20 vs. CSFZX (9.97). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.75 vs. BLRAX (22.26).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.84 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.84 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.296 | 6.758 | 93% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112M | 1.99B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 2.67 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.20 | 9.97 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.47 | 15.38 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.26 | 30.75 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.96 | 46.53 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement