Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$12.43
Change+$0.64 (+5.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets121.22M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.94
Change+$1.08 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a StrongBuy and CSFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. BLRAX (121M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (3.42) vs BLRAX (1.99). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (14 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.08 vs. CSFZX (11.74). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 19.32 vs. BLRAX (17.20).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.84 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.84 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.325 | 2.548 | 130% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121M | 2.05B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 3.42 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.08 | 11.74 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 14.59 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.20 | 19.32 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.92 | 64.06 | 67% |