Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets115.9M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.31
Change+$0.16 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a Buy and CSFZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. BLRAX (116M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.93) vs BLRAX (2.38). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX (3.86) and CSFZX (3.69) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 28.17 vs. BLRAX (22.00).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.84 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.84 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.493 | 8.129 | 80% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 1.98B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 2.93 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.86 | 3.69 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.19 | 3.36 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.00 | 28.17 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.36 | 44.68 | 39% |