It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLNK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESOA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLNK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESOA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BLNK (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -7.06% price change this week, while ESOA (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +18.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.95%.
BLNK is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.
ESOA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
BLNK | ESOA | BLNK / ESOA | |
Capitalization | 160M | 297M | 54% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -53.392 | 199.906 | -27% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 11.85 | - |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 66.7M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 17.9M | 34.4M | 52% |
BLNK | ESOA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLNK's Valuation (49) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as ESOA (60) in the null industry. This means that BLNK’s stock grew similarly to ESOA’s over the last 12 months.
ESOA's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLNK (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ESOA’s stock grew significantly faster than BLNK’s over the last 12 months.
ESOA's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLNK (98) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ESOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLNK’s over the last 12 months.
ESOA's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BLNK (64) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ESOA’s stock grew similarly to BLNK’s over the last 12 months.
BLNK's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESOA (63) in the null industry. This means that BLNK’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESOA’s over the last 12 months.
BLNK | ESOA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago88% | 9 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLNK has been loosely correlated with AMRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLNK jumps, then AMRC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLNK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BLNK | 100% | -1.25% | ||
AMRC - BLNK | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
STN - BLNK | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
BLD - BLNK | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
ACM - BLNK | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
WLDN - BLNK | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.98% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESOA has been loosely correlated with CTNGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESOA jumps, then CTNGY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESOA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESOA | 100% | -4.79% | ||
CTNGY - ESOA | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
GLDD - ESOA | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.74% | ||
BLNK - ESOA | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
STRL - ESOA | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
FIX - ESOA | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.84% | ||
More |