BLMN
Price
$9.39
Change
+$0.03 (+0.32%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
798.73M
17 days until earnings call
STKS
Price
$3.71
Change
-$0.09 (-2.37%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
114.65M
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMN vs STKS

Header iconBLMN vs STKS Comparison
Open Charts BLMN vs STKSBanner chart's image
Bloomin' Brands
Price$9.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
Volume$1.68M
Capitalization798.73M
ONE Group Hospitality (The)
Price$3.71
Change-$0.09 (-2.37%)
Volume$144.31K
Capitalization114.65M
BLMN vs STKS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STKS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMN vs. STKS commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Hold and STKS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMN: $9.39 vs. STKS: $3.71)
Brand notoriety: BLMN and STKS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 69% vs. STKS: 77%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $798.73M vs. STKS: $114.65M
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $798.73M. STKS’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $114.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTKS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STKS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STKS is a better buy in the long-term than BLMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STKS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STKS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLMN is a better buy in the short-term than STKS.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а -6.38% price change this week, while STKS (@Restaurants) price change was -20.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

STKS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.89% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLMN($799M) has a higher market cap than STKS($115M). STKS has higher P/E ratio than BLMN: STKS (32.00) vs BLMN (10.55). STKS YTD gains are higher at: 27.931 vs. BLMN (-20.421). BLMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 303M vs. STKS (95.5M). BLMN has more cash in the bank: 57.7M vs. STKS (21.4M). STKS has less debt than BLMN: STKS (639M) vs BLMN (2.18B). BLMN has higher revenues than STKS: BLMN (3.93B) vs STKS (799M).
BLMNSTKSBLMN / STKS
Capitalization799M115M695%
EBITDA303M95.5M317%
Gain YTD-20.42127.931-73%
P/E Ratio10.5532.0033%
Revenue3.93B799M492%
Total Cash57.7M21.4M270%
Total Debt2.18B639M340%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs STKS: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
STKS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5752
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9686
SMR RATING
1..100
9098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
979
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STKS (60). This means that BLMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than STKS’s over the last 12 months.

STKS's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (96). This means that STKS’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's SMR Rating (90) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as STKS (98). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to STKS’s over the last 12 months.

STKS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (59). This means that STKS’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

STKS's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLMN (97). This means that STKS’s stock grew significantly faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNSTKS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STKS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMCCP20.000.22
+1.10%
Freddie Mac
GEGYF0.91N/A
N/A
Genel Energy PLC
NYUKF35.32N/A
N/A
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha
CUCSF0.59N/A
N/A
China Communications Services Corp., Ltd.
DNCVF0.17N/A
-1.71%
Defiance Silver Corp.

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been loosely correlated with CBRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then CBRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
+0.32%
CBRL - BLMN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
DIN - BLMN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
CAKE - BLMN
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
BJRI - BLMN
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.93%
DRI - BLMN
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
More

STKS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STKS has been loosely correlated with BLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STKS jumps, then BLMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STKS
1D Price
Change %
STKS100%
-2.37%
BLMN - STKS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
RICK - STKS
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
CAKE - STKS
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
DIN - STKS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
CBRL - STKS
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
More