BLMIF
Price
$19.07
Change
+$0.32 (+1.71%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
12.16B
BWAGF
Price
$126.28
Change
+$1.93 (+1.55%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMIF vs BWAGF

Header iconBLMIF vs BWAGF Comparison
Open Charts BLMIF vs BWAGFBanner chart's image
Bank Leumi Le Israel
Price$19.07
Change+$0.32 (+1.71%)
Volume$2.99K
Capitalization12.16B
BAWAG Group AG
Price$126.28
Change+$1.93 (+1.55%)
Volume$225
Capitalization4.01B
BLMIF vs BWAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BWAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMIF vs. BWAGF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMIF is a Hold and BWAGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMIF: $19.07 vs. BWAGF: $126.28)
Brand notoriety: BLMIF and BWAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMIF: 319% vs. BWAGF: 106%
Market capitalization -- BLMIF: $12.16B vs. BWAGF: $4.01B
BLMIF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.16B. BWAGF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBWAGF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BWAGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BLMIF and BWAGF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BWAGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BWAGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWAGF is a better buy in the short-term than BLMIF.

Price Growth

BLMIF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.71% price change this week, while BWAGF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLMIF($12.2B) has a higher market cap than BWAGF($4.01B). BWAGF has higher P/E ratio than BLMIF: BWAGF (9.37) vs BLMIF (5.92). BLMIF YTD gains are higher at: 58.257 vs. BWAGF (48.038). BWAGF has less debt than BLMIF: BWAGF (10.4B) vs BLMIF (28.3B). BLMIF has higher revenues than BWAGF: BLMIF (18.4B) vs BWAGF (1.38B).
BLMIFBWAGFBLMIF / BWAGF
Capitalization12.2B4.01B304%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD58.25748.038121%
P/E Ratio5.929.3763%
Revenue18.4B1.38B1,329%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt28.3B10.4B272%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMIF vs BWAGF: Fundamental Ratings
BLMIF
BWAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
125
SMR RATING
1..100
310
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMIF's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as BWAGF (89). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to BWAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMIF (12). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to BLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BWAGF (10). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to BWAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMIF (39). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to BLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BWAGF (17). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to BWAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMIFBWAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
30%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BWAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCY20.510.10
+0.49%
Invesco Emerging Markets Sov Debt ETF
MSFY27.230.13
+0.47%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Microsoft ETF
MINV32.93-0.10
-0.29%
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
EUAD42.36-0.26
-0.61%
Select STOXX Europe Aersspc & Defns ETF
EOT16.12-0.10
-0.62%
EATON VANCE NATIONAL Municipal OPPORTUNITIES TRUST

BLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMIF has been loosely correlated with CMBNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMIF jumps, then CMBNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMIF
1D Price
Change %
BLMIF100%
N/A
CMBNF - BLMIF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BWAGF - BLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BORT - BLMIF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBCSF - BLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - BLMIF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BWAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWAGF has been loosely correlated with CMBNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWAGF jumps, then CMBNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWAGF
1D Price
Change %
BWAGF100%
N/A
CMBNF - BWAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TVLF - BWAGF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLMIF - BWAGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBF - BWAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
MTFC - BWAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More