BLMIF
Price
$19.07
Change
+$0.32 (+1.71%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
12.16B
BNKHF
Price
$4.55
Change
-$0.10 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
32.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMIF vs BNKHF

Header iconBLMIF vs BNKHF Comparison
Open Charts BLMIF vs BNKHFBanner chart's image
Bank Leumi Le Israel
Price$19.07
Change+$0.32 (+1.71%)
Volume$2.99K
Capitalization12.16B
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings)
Price$4.55
Change-$0.10 (-2.15%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization32.14B
BLMIF vs BNKHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMIF vs. BNKHF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMIF is a Hold and BNKHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMIF: $19.07 vs. BNKHF: $4.55)
Brand notoriety: BLMIF and BNKHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMIF: 319% vs. BNKHF: 194%
Market capitalization -- BLMIF: $12.16B vs. BNKHF: $32.14B
BLMIF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.16B. BNKHF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $32.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBNKHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BNKHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLMIF is a better buy in the long-term than BNKHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BNKHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BNKHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BLMIF and BNKHF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BLMIF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.71% price change this week, while BNKHF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNKHF($32.1B) has a higher market cap than BLMIF($12.2B). BNKHF has higher P/E ratio than BLMIF: BNKHF (8.75) vs BLMIF (5.92). BLMIF YTD gains are higher at: 58.257 vs. BNKHF (44.444). BNKHF has less debt than BLMIF: BNKHF (4.94B) vs BLMIF (28.3B). BNKHF has higher revenues than BLMIF: BNKHF (66.4B) vs BLMIF (18.4B).
BLMIFBNKHFBLMIF / BNKHF
Capitalization12.2B32.1B38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD58.25744.444131%
P/E Ratio5.928.7568%
Revenue18.4B66.4B28%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt28.3B4.94B573%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMIF vs BNKHF: Fundamental Ratings
BLMIF
BNKHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1251
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1129
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNKHF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMIF (81). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew similarly to BLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNKHF (51). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

BNKHF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMIF (3). This means that BNKHF’s stock grew similarly to BLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BNKHF (42). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BNKHF (29). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to BNKHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMIFBNKHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
30%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BNKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LKFN66.132.37
+3.72%
Lakeland Financial Corp
DSGX107.671.22
+1.15%
Descartes Systems Group
VIGL8.05N/A
N/A
Vigil Neuroscience
BWBBP19.37N/A
N/A
Bridgewater Bancshares
GRRR17.73-0.04
-0.20%
Gorilla Technology Group

BLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMIF has been loosely correlated with CMBNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMIF jumps, then CMBNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMIF
1D Price
Change %
BLMIF100%
N/A
CMBNF - BLMIF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BWAGF - BLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BORT - BLMIF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBCSF - BLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - BLMIF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BNKHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNKHF and KBCSF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNKHF and KBCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNKHF
1D Price
Change %
BNKHF100%
N/A
KBCSF - BNKHF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIBGY - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
LSFG - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - BNKHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
MDIBF - BNKHF
24%
Poorly correlated
+16.18%
More