BLMIF
Price
$18.30
Change
+$0.11 (+0.60%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
28B
BMBN
Price
$31.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
138.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMIF vs BMBN

Header iconBLMIF vs BMBN Comparison
Open Charts BLMIF vs BMBNBanner chart's image
Bank Leumi Le Israel
Price$18.30
Change+$0.11 (+0.60%)
Volume$100
Capitalization28B
Benchmark Bankshares
Price$31.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$501
Capitalization138.43M
BLMIF vs BMBN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BMBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMIF vs. BMBN commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMIF is a StrongBuy and BMBN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMIF: $18.30 vs. BMBN: $31.00)
Brand notoriety: BLMIF and BMBN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMIF: 10% vs. BMBN: 24%
Market capitalization -- BLMIF: $28B vs. BMBN: $138.43M
BLMIF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $28B. BMBN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $138.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBMBN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BMBN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BLMIF and BMBN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BMBN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BMBN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLMIF is a better buy in the short-term than BMBN.

Price Growth

BLMIF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.45% price change this week, while BMBN (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLMIF($28B) has a higher market cap than BMBN($138M). BLMIF has higher P/E ratio than BMBN: BLMIF (9.55) vs BMBN (8.03). BLMIF YTD gains are higher at: 51.867 vs. BMBN (23.255). BMBN has less debt than BLMIF: BMBN (477K) vs BLMIF (34.1B). BLMIF has higher revenues than BMBN: BLMIF (21.2B) vs BMBN (57.6M).
BLMIFBMBNBLMIF / BMBN
Capitalization28B138M20,290%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD51.86723.255223%
P/E Ratio9.558.03119%
Revenue21.2B57.6M36,806%
Total CashN/A18.5M-
Total Debt34.1B477K7,148,847%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMIF vs BMBN: Fundamental Ratings
BLMIF
BMBN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
155
SMR RATING
1..100
443
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1218
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5042

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMIF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBN (41). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to BMBN’s over the last 12 months.

BMBN's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMIF (15). This means that BMBN’s stock grew similarly to BLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMBN (43). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMBN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBN (41). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to BMBN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBN (18). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to BMBN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMIFBMBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
30%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BMBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LHCAX19.130.12
+0.63%
Lord Abbett Health Care A
REUYX47.20-0.06
-0.13%
Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq Y
ITHRX52.71-0.14
-0.26%
Hartford Capital Appreciation R3
ASCLX13.56-0.04
-0.29%
AB Select US Long/Short C
BDAIX32.25-0.17
-0.52%
Baron Durable Advantage Institutional

BLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMIF has been loosely correlated with CMBNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMIF jumps, then CMBNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMIF
1D Price
Change %
BLMIF100%
N/A
CMBNF - BLMIF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BWAGF - BLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BORT - BLMIF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBCSF - BLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - BLMIF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BMBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBN and BKCYF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBN and BKCYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMBN
1D Price
Change %
BMBN100%
+0.03%
BKCYF - BMBN
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLHK - BMBN
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
BLMIF - BMBN
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNCZF - BMBN
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - BMBN
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More