Advertisement
BLMH vs TSNDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMH is a Hold and TSNDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLMH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSNDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BLMH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TSNDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLMH’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSNDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLMH’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 8 bearish.
- TSNDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BLMH (@Drugstore Chains) experienced а -16.06% price change this week, while TSNDF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -15.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Drugstore Chains industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.17%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
TSNDF is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Drugstore Chains (+1.73% weekly)The drugstore chains industry includes stores that sell medicines (both prescription and non-prescription), health, beauty and personal care products. Over time, many pharmacy retail chains have launched their own pharmacy benefits management services. Since demand for medical products is typically less sensitive to economic cycles, drugstore retail chains industry could be largely considered as non-cyclical. CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation are some of the biggest operators in this industry.
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+0.73% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
| BLMH | TSNDF | BLMH / TSNDF | |
| Capitalization | 13.9M | 153M | 9% |
| EBITDA | 15M | 11.3M | 133% |
| Gain YTD | 23.596 | -24.954 | -95% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.77 | 12.20 | 6% |
| Revenue | 13.1M | 300M | 4% |
| Total Cash | 370K | 27.7M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 6.69M | 242M | 3% |
BLMH | TSNDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 39 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLMH's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as TSNDF (56). This means that BLMH’s stock grew similarly to TSNDF’s over the last 12 months.
BLMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TSNDF (100). This means that BLMH’s stock grew similarly to TSNDF’s over the last 12 months.
TSNDF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMH (100). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew similarly to BLMH’s over the last 12 months.
TSNDF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMH (61). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew similarly to BLMH’s over the last 12 months.
BLMH's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as TSNDF (98). This means that BLMH’s stock grew similarly to TSNDF’s over the last 12 months.
| BLMH | TSNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 78% | 15 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
BLMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BLMH and CVSI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLMH and CVSI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLMH | 100% | -8.35% | ||
| CVSI - BLMH | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.47% | ||
| ESALF - BLMH | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CTTH - BLMH | 21% Poorly correlated | +7.00% | ||
| VEXTF - BLMH | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
| SDZXF - BLMH | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TSNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSNDF has been closely correlated with GTBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSNDF jumps, then GTBIF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSNDF | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| GTBIF - TSNDF | 78% Closely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| CRLBF - TSNDF | 76% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| TCNNF - TSNDF | 76% Closely correlated | +2.59% | ||
| CURLF - TSNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| JUSHF - TSNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +6.11% | ||
More | ||||