BLMH
Price
$0.65
Change
-$0.04 (-5.80%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
8.79M
TSNDF
Price
$0.83
Change
+$0.01 (+1.22%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
264.96M
93 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMH vs TSNDF

Header iconBLMH vs TSNDF Comparison
Open Charts BLMH vs TSNDFBanner chart's image
Blum Holdings
Price$0.65
Change-$0.04 (-5.80%)
Volume$2.81K
Capitalization8.79M
TerrAscend
Price$0.83
Change+$0.01 (+1.22%)
Volume$975.2K
Capitalization264.96M
BLMH vs TSNDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMH vs. TSNDF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMH is a Hold and TSNDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMH: $0.65 vs. TSNDF: $0.83)
Brand notoriety: BLMH and TSNDF are both not notable
BLMH represents the Drugstore Chains, while TSNDF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMH: 73% vs. TSNDF: 148%
Market capitalization -- BLMH: $8.79M vs. TSNDF: $264.96M
BLMH [@Drugstore Chains] is valued at $8.79M. TSNDF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $264.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Drugstore Chains] industry ranges from $24.97B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $68.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Drugstore Chains] industry is $3.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSNDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TSNDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSNDF is a better buy in the long-term than BLMH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSNDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 9 bearish.
  • TSNDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSNDF is a better buy in the short-term than BLMH.

Price Growth

BLMH (@Drugstore Chains) experienced а +0.89% price change this week, while TSNDF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +49.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Drugstore Chains industry was -1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.90%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +68.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +80.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

TSNDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Drugstore Chains (-1.56% weekly)

The drugstore chains industry includes stores that sell medicines (both prescription and non-prescription), health, beauty and personal care products. Over time, many pharmacy retail chains have launched their own pharmacy benefits management services. Since demand for medical products is typically less sensitive to economic cycles, drugstore retail chains industry could be largely considered as non-cyclical. CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation are some of the biggest operators in this industry.

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+6.26% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSNDF($265M) has a higher market cap than BLMH($8.79M). BLMH YTD gains are higher at: 45.781 vs. TSNDF (27.554). TSNDF has more cash in the bank: 30.2M vs. BLMH (1.03M). BLMH has less debt than TSNDF: BLMH (13.1M) vs TSNDF (246M).
BLMHTSNDFBLMH / TSNDF
Capitalization8.79M265M3%
EBITDAN/A9.91M-
Gain YTD45.78127.554166%
P/E RatioN/A82.91-
RevenueN/A297M-
Total Cash1.03M30.2M3%
Total Debt13.1M246M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMH vs TSNDF: Fundamental Ratings
BLMH
TSNDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1008
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMH's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSNDF (79). This means that BLMH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSNDF’s over the last 12 months.

BLMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TSNDF (100). This means that BLMH’s stock grew similarly to TSNDF’s over the last 12 months.

TSNDF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMH (100). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew similarly to BLMH’s over the last 12 months.

TSNDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMH (53). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew similarly to BLMH’s over the last 12 months.

TSNDF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLMH (100). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew significantly faster than BLMH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMHTSNDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGNE20.510.31
+1.53%
Neurogene
ESHA11.18N/A
N/A
ESH Acquisition Corp
UMH15.97-0.04
-0.22%
UMH Properties
HD399.38-0.94
-0.23%
Home Depot
OLED141.47-2.11
-1.47%
Universal Display Corp

BLMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLMH and EOLS have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLMH and EOLS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMH
1D Price
Change %
BLMH100%
-5.98%
EOLS - BLMH
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.16%
ESALF - BLMH
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
CVSI - BLMH
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.71%
TSNDF - BLMH
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
SDZNY - BLMH
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More

TSNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSNDF has been closely correlated with GTBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSNDF jumps, then GTBIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSNDF
1D Price
Change %
TSNDF100%
+1.10%
GTBIF - TSNDF
77%
Closely correlated
-12.40%
TCNNF - TSNDF
76%
Closely correlated
-7.35%
CRLBF - TSNDF
75%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
VRNOF - TSNDF
73%
Closely correlated
-19.33%
CURLF - TSNDF
73%
Closely correlated
-9.48%
More