BLKLF
Price
$5.35
Change
+$0.20 (+3.88%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
463.78M
OLO
Price
$10.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.74B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLKLF vs OLO

Header iconBLKLF vs OLO Comparison
Open Charts BLKLF vs OLOBanner chart's image
Blackline Safety
Price$5.35
Change+$0.20 (+3.88%)
Volume$5.07K
Capitalization463.78M
Olo
Price$10.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.15M
Capitalization1.74B
BLKLF vs OLO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLKLF vs. OLO commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLKLF is a Buy and OLO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BLKLF: $5.35 vs. OLO: $10.26)
Brand notoriety: BLKLF and OLO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLKLF: 41% vs. OLO: 192%
Market capitalization -- BLKLF: $463.78M vs. OLO: $1.74B
BLKLF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $463.78M. OLO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLKLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOLO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLKLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the long-term than BLKLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLKLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLKLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OLO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BLKLF and OLO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BLKLF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.86% price change this week, while OLO (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

OLO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OLO($1.74B) has a higher market cap than BLKLF($464M). OLO has higher P/E ratio than BLKLF: OLO (1039.00) vs BLKLF (9.44). OLO YTD gains are higher at: 33.594 vs. BLKLF (21.568). OLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.6M vs. BLKLF (5.17M). OLO has more cash in the bank: 377M vs. BLKLF (52.6M). BLKLF (12.6M) and OLO (12.7M) have identical debt. OLO has higher revenues than BLKLF: OLO (314M) vs BLKLF (143M).
BLKLFOLOBLKLF / OLO
Capitalization464M1.74B27%
EBITDA5.17M16.6M31%
Gain YTD21.56833.59464%
P/E Ratio9.441039.001%
Revenue143M314M46%
Total Cash52.6M377M14%
Total Debt12.6M12.7M99%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLKLF vs OLO: Fundamental Ratings
BLKLF
OLO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2219
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8688
SMR RATING
1..100
9592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10030
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLKLF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (24). This means that BLKLF’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

BLKLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (88). This means that BLKLF’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as BLKLF (95). This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to BLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as BLKLF (47). This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to BLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLKLF (100). This means that OLO’s stock grew significantly faster than BLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKLFOLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMRIX13.110.07
+0.54%
Nationwide Small Cap Index R6
PEIIX42.970.04
+0.09%
Principal Equity Income Inst
UGLSX76.79N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R6
JGERX13.14N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Equity R2
WIMVX12.14N/A
N/A
Segall Bryant & Hamill Glb All Cp Inst

BLKLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLKLF and PSHPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLKLF and PSHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLKLF
1D Price
Change %
BLKLF100%
+3.86%
PSHPF - BLKLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPNAF - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVCM - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
NCCGF - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLO - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLO
1D Price
Change %
OLO100%
N/A
WRDLY - OLO
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
SHOP - OLO
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
EVCM - OLO
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
QTWO - OLO
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
WEAV - OLO
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
More