BLKLF
Price
$5.27
Change
-$0.01 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
219.79M
OLO
Price
$8.90
Change
+$0.28 (+3.25%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
888.81M
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLKLF vs OLO

Header iconBLKLF vs OLO Comparison
Open Charts BLKLF vs OLOBanner chart's image
Blackline Safety
Price$5.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.19%)
Volume$450
Capitalization219.79M
Olo
Price$8.90
Change+$0.28 (+3.25%)
Volume$11.92K
Capitalization888.81M
BLKLF vs OLO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLKLF vs. OLO commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLKLF is a Hold and OLO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (BLKLF: $5.27 vs. OLO: $8.62)
Brand notoriety: BLKLF and OLO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLKLF: 11% vs. OLO: 243%
Market capitalization -- BLKLF: $219.79M vs. OLO: $888.81M
BLKLF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $219.79M. OLO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $888.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLKLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOLO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLKLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OLO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLKLF is a better buy in the long-term than OLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLKLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLKLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OLO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BLKLF and OLO are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BLKLF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.04% price change this week, while OLO (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

OLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.75% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OLO($889M) has a higher market cap than BLKLF($220M). BLKLF YTD gains are higher at: 19.876 vs. OLO (12.240). BLKLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -12.73M vs. OLO (-47.56M). OLO has more cash in the bank: 363M vs. BLKLF (15.9M). BLKLF has less debt than OLO: BLKLF (13.2M) vs OLO (18.9M). OLO has higher revenues than BLKLF: OLO (228M) vs BLKLF (105M).
BLKLFOLOBLKLF / OLO
Capitalization220M889M25%
EBITDA-12.73M-47.56M27%
Gain YTD19.87612.240162%
P/E RatioN/A9.87-
Revenue105M228M46%
Total Cash15.9M363M4%
Total Debt13.2M18.9M70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLKLF vs OLO: Fundamental Ratings
BLKLF
OLO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7893
SMR RATING
1..100
9389
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10054
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLKLF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (81). This means that BLKLF’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

BLKLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (93). This means that BLKLF’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as BLKLF (93). This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to BLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as BLKLF (44). This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to BLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLKLF (100). This means that OLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKLFOLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLTAX15.910.14
+0.89%
Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation A
AMEIX34.710.24
+0.70%
American Century Equity Growth I
EMEAX12.920.09
+0.70%
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity A
PZFVX24.780.08
+0.32%
JHancock Classic Value A
AMVYX15.810.03
+0.19%
American Century Mid Cap Value Y

BLKLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLKLF and PSHPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLKLF and PSHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLKLF
1D Price
Change %
BLKLF100%
-0.09%
PSHPF - BLKLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPNAF - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVCM - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
NCCGF - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLO - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
More

OLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLO
1D Price
Change %
OLO100%
-1.60%
QTWO - OLO
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
WRDLY - OLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-9.69%
EVCM - OLO
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
AMPL - OLO
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
SHOP - OLO
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
More