BLKLF
Price
$5.35
Change
+$0.20 (+3.88%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
463.78M
IPNAF
Price
$28.75
Change
+$1.35 (+4.93%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
129.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLKLF vs IPNAF

Header iconBLKLF vs IPNAF Comparison
Open Charts BLKLF vs IPNAFBanner chart's image
Blackline Safety
Price$5.35
Change+$0.20 (+3.88%)
Volume$5.07K
Capitalization463.78M
Information Planning
Price$28.75
Change+$1.35 (+4.93%)
Volume$72
Capitalization129.99M
BLKLF vs IPNAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLKLF vs. IPNAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLKLF is a Buy and IPNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BLKLF: $5.35 vs. IPNAF: $28.75)
Brand notoriety: BLKLF and IPNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLKLF: 41% vs. IPNAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BLKLF: $463.78M vs. IPNAF: $129.99M
BLKLF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $463.78M. IPNAF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $129.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLKLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIPNAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLKLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IPNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPNAF is a better buy in the long-term than BLKLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLKLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BLKLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BLKLF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.86% price change this week, while IPNAF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLKLF($464M) has a higher market cap than IPNAF($130M). IPNAF has higher P/E ratio than BLKLF: IPNAF (11.81) vs BLKLF (9.44). BLKLF YTD gains are higher at: 21.568 vs. IPNAF (18.070). IPNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.69B vs. BLKLF (5.17M). IPNAF has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. BLKLF (52.6M). IPNAF has higher revenues than BLKLF: IPNAF (3.8B) vs BLKLF (143M).
BLKLFIPNAFBLKLF / IPNAF
Capitalization464M130M357%
EBITDA5.17M1.69B0%
Gain YTD21.56818.070119%
P/E Ratio9.4411.8180%
Revenue143M3.8B4%
Total Cash52.6M2.58B2%
Total Debt12.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLKLF: Fundamental Ratings
BLKLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
14

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKLFIPNAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WWIAX12.46N/A
N/A
Westwood Income Opportunity A
FDTTX26.72N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development A
CMALX26.97N/A
N/A
Crawford Multi-Asset Income
UIVMX12.79N/A
N/A
MFS Intrinsic Value R1
IBALX36.53-0.02
-0.05%
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced A

BLKLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLKLF and PSHPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLKLF and PSHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLKLF
1D Price
Change %
BLKLF100%
+3.86%
PSHPF - BLKLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPNAF - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVCM - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
NCCGF - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLO - BLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IPNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPNAF has been closely correlated with PSHPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPNAF jumps, then PSHPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPNAF
1D Price
Change %
IPNAF100%
N/A
PSHPF - IPNAF
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
PHUN - IPNAF
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
TDCSF - IPNAF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DV - IPNAF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
MYSE - IPNAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.14%
More