It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLKB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTDC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLKB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BLKB (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.62% price change this week, while TDC (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
BLKB is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.
TDC is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
BLKB | TDC | BLKB / TDC | |
Capitalization | 3.97B | 3.78B | 105% |
EBITDA | 167M | 263M | 63% |
Gain YTD | -3.114 | -31.602 | 10% |
P/E Ratio | 2510.33 | 62.97 | 3,987% |
Revenue | 1.11B | 1.83B | 60% |
Total Cash | 31.3M | 486M | 6% |
Total Debt | 820M | 640M | 128% |
BLKB | TDC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TDC's Valuation (71) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as BLKB (72) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TDC’s stock grew similarly to BLKB’s over the last 12 months.
TDC's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as BLKB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TDC’s stock grew similarly to BLKB’s over the last 12 months.
TDC's SMR Rating (31) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLKB (78) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLKB’s over the last 12 months.
BLKB's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TDC (61) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that BLKB’s stock grew similarly to TDC’s over the last 12 months.
TDC's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as BLKB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TDC’s stock grew similarly to BLKB’s over the last 12 months.
BLKB | TDC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 3 days ago59% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 3 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 3 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 3 days ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 3 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 3 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago58% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 3 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago69% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLKB has been loosely correlated with DJCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLKB jumps, then DJCO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLKB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BLKB | 100% | -3.00% | ||
DJCO - BLKB | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
VRNS - BLKB | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
SPSC - BLKB | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.71% | ||
BL - BLKB | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.93% | ||
PLUS - BLKB | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDC has been loosely correlated with MQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TDC jumps, then MQ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TDC | 100% | +1.05% | ||
MQ - TDC | 40% Loosely correlated | -4.87% | ||
BLKB - TDC | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
FIVN - TDC | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
SSNC - TDC | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
ONTF - TDC | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.99% | ||
More |