BLK
Price
$1076.23
Change
+$6.15 (+0.57%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
166.91B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WHG
Price
$18.26
Change
+$0.12 (+0.66%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
171.79M
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLK vs WHG

Header iconBLK vs WHG Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs WHGBanner chart's image
Blackrock
Price$1076.23
Change+$6.15 (+0.57%)
Volume$4.31K
Capitalization166.91B
Westwood Holdings Group
Price$18.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.66%)
Volume$6.13K
Capitalization171.79M
BLK vs WHG Comparison Chart in %
BLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. WHG commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a StrongBuy and WHG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BLK: $1070.08 vs. WHG: $18.14)
Brand notoriety: BLK and WHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 144% vs. WHG: 46%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $166.91B vs. WHG: $171.79M
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $166.91B. WHG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $171.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $166.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWHG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the long-term than WHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WHG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHG is a better buy in the short-term than BLK.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.31% price change this week, while WHG (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Apr 10, 2026.

WHG is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.43% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($167B) has a higher market cap than WHG($172M). BLK has higher P/E ratio than WHG: BLK (30.48) vs WHG (22.00). WHG YTD gains are higher at: 5.404 vs. BLK (-0.024). BLK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.71B vs. WHG (11.3M). WHG has less debt than BLK: WHG (10.3M) vs BLK (15B). BLK has higher revenues than WHG: BLK (22.9B) vs WHG (96.2M).
BLKWHGBLK / WHG
Capitalization167B172M97,093%
EBITDA9.71B11.3M85,947%
Gain YTD-0.0245.404-0%
P/E Ratio30.4822.00139%
Revenue22.9B96.2M23,805%
Total CashN/A39.3M-
Total Debt15B10.3M145,631%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs WHG: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
WHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1415
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4566
SMR RATING
1..100
6183
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2595
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHG's Valuation (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BLK (28) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that WHG’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as WHG (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to WHG’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's SMR Rating (61) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as WHG (83) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to WHG’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as WHG (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to WHG’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for WHG (95) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew significantly faster than WHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKWHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTEC62.511.27
+2.08%
Global X CleanTech ETF
HSCZ40.750.29
+0.71%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI EAFE SmCp ETF
DGRO72.510.18
+0.25%
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
DECM32.99N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Dec
JCPI48.35-0.04
-0.08%
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then STT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
-4.43%
STT - BLK
79%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
JHG - BLK
75%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
BN - BLK
74%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
BX - BLK
73%
Closely correlated
-5.24%
TROW - BLK
73%
Closely correlated
-3.74%
More

WHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHG has been loosely correlated with ACGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHG jumps, then ACGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHG
1D Price
Change %
WHG100%
-1.31%
ACGP - WHG
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
BLK - WHG
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.43%
BEN - WHG
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
AMP - WHG
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
IVZ - WHG
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More