BLK
Price
$1076.23
Change
+$6.15 (+0.57%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
165.97B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IGIFF
Price
$48.18
Change
+$11.09 (+29.90%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLK vs IGIFF

Header iconBLK vs IGIFF Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs IGIFFBanner chart's image
Blackrock
Price$1076.23
Change+$6.15 (+0.57%)
Volume$4.31K
Capitalization165.97B
IGM Financial
Price$48.18
Change+$11.09 (+29.90%)
Volume$6.35K
Capitalization11.36B
BLK vs IGIFF Comparison Chart in %
BLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IGIFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. IGIFF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a StrongBuy and IGIFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BLK: $1070.08 vs. IGIFF: $48.18)
Brand notoriety: BLK and IGIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 144% vs. IGIFF: 23%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $165.97B vs. IGIFF: $11.36B
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $165.97B. IGIFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIGIFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IGIFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the long-term than IGIFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IGIFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IGIFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the short-term than IGIFF.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.31% price change this week, while IGIFF (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Apr 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.43% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($166B) has a higher market cap than IGIFF($11.4B). BLK has higher P/E ratio than IGIFF: BLK (30.31) vs IGIFF (15.15). IGIFF YTD gains are higher at: 6.806 vs. BLK (-0.024). BLK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.71B vs. IGIFF (1.47B). IGIFF has less debt than BLK: IGIFF (7.47B) vs BLK (15B). BLK has higher revenues than IGIFF: BLK (22.9B) vs IGIFF (3.73B).
BLKIGIFFBLK / IGIFF
Capitalization166B11.4B1,456%
EBITDA9.71B1.47B662%
Gain YTD-0.0246.806-0%
P/E Ratio30.3115.15200%
Revenue22.9B3.73B614%
Total CashN/A3.35B-
Total Debt15B7.47B201%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs IGIFF: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
IGIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1414
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4546
SMR RATING
1..100
6161
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2525
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLK's Valuation (28) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IGIFF (75) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IGIFF (46) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's SMR Rating (61) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IGIFF (61) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IGIFF (41) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IGIFF (25) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKIGIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IGIFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTEC62.511.27
+2.08%
Global X CleanTech ETF
HSCZ40.750.29
+0.71%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI EAFE SmCp ETF
DGRO72.510.18
+0.25%
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
DECM32.99N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Dec
JCPI48.35-0.04
-0.08%
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then STT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
-4.43%
STT - BLK
79%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
JHG - BLK
75%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
BN - BLK
74%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
BX - BLK
73%
Closely correlated
-5.24%
TROW - BLK
73%
Closely correlated
-3.74%
More

IGIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGIFF has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IGIFF jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGIFF
1D Price
Change %
IGIFF100%
-0.34%
APAM - IGIFF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
BN - IGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
-4.21%
BLK - IGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
-4.43%
BAM - IGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
-6.68%
NTRS - IGIFF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
More