BLK
Price
$1080.20
Change
+$41.58 (+4.00%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
161.35B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CG
Price
$55.81
Change
+$1.77 (+3.28%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.49B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLK vs CG

Header iconBLK vs CG Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs CGBanner chart's image
Blackrock
Price$1080.20
Change+$41.58 (+4.00%)
Volume$9.65K
Capitalization161.35B
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$55.81
Change+$1.77 (+3.28%)
Volume$59.97K
Capitalization19.49B
BLK vs CG Comparison Chart in %
BLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. CG commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a StrongBuy and CG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BLK: $1038.68 vs. CG: $54.05)
Brand notoriety: BLK and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 18% vs. CG: 14%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $161.35B vs. CG: $19.49B
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $161.35B. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $19.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $161.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than BLK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the short-term than BLK.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.87% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

CG is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($161B) has a higher market cap than CG($19.5B). CG has higher P/E ratio than BLK: CG (30.38) vs BLK (26.77). CG YTD gains are higher at: 9.176 vs. BLK (2.900). CG has less debt than BLK: CG (10.7B) vs BLK (14.7B). BLK has higher revenues than CG: BLK (21.6B) vs CG (3.71B).
BLKCGBLK / CG
Capitalization161B19.5B826%
EBITDA9.76BN/A-
Gain YTD2.9009.17632%
P/E Ratio26.7730.3888%
Revenue21.6B3.71B582%
Total Cash11.6BN/A-
Total Debt14.7B10.7B137%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3642
SMR RATING
1..100
5530
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CG's Valuation (27) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (78). This means that CG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (42). This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (30) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (55). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (59). This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (99). This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGEM37.880.18
+0.48%
abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Act ETF
PEXL59.660.19
+0.32%
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF
DYNF60.790.18
+0.30%
iShares U.S. Equity Fac Rotation Act ETF
GTIP49.500.03
+0.06%
Goldman Sachs Acs Infl Protd USD Bd ETF
GWX40.28-0.07
-0.17%
SPDR® S&P® International Small Cap ETF

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then STT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
-0.12%
STT - BLK
80%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
CG - BLK
75%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
AMG - BLK
75%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
BX - BLK
73%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
SEIC - BLK
73%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
More

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-0.02%
KKR - CG
88%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
TPG - CG
88%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
BX - CG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
ARES - CG
83%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
STEP - CG
81%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
More