BLIDF
Price
$31.07
Change
-$0.18 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SGPTF
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLIDF vs SGPTF

Header iconBLIDF vs SGPTF Comparison
Open Charts BLIDF vs SGPTFBanner chart's image
Boliden AB
Price$31.07
Change-$0.18 (-0.58%)
Volume$265
CapitalizationN/A
SAGE POTASH
Price$0.22
Change+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Volume$12K
CapitalizationN/A
BLIDF vs SGPTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLIDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLIDF vs. SGPTF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLIDF is a Hold and SGPTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BLIDF: $31.07 vs. SGPTF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: BLIDF and SGPTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLIDF: 134% vs. SGPTF: 14%
Market capitalization -- BLIDF: $0 vs. SGPTF: $0
BLIDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $0. SGPTF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLIDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGPTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLIDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGPTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLIDF is a better buy in the long-term than SGPTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLIDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGPTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLIDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SGPTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLIDF is a better buy in the short-term than SGPTF.

Price Growth

BLIDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while SGPTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGPTF YTD gains are higher at: 70.929 vs. BLIDF (12.579).
BLIDFSGPTFBLIDF / SGPTF
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.57970.92918%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLIDFSGPTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLIDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AURA6.560.10
+1.55%
Aura Biosciences
BWLP12.500.13
+1.05%
BW LPG Ltd.
LNW99.520.37
+0.37%
Light & Wonder
QETAU10.84N/A
N/A
Quetta Acquisition Corp
MTEN9.80-0.45
-4.39%
Mingteng International Corp

BLIDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLIDF and CGNMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLIDF and CGNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLIDF
1D Price
Change %
BLIDF100%
N/A
CGNMF - BLIDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BATXF - BLIDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABAT - BLIDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
LAC - BLIDF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
SGPTF - BLIDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.63%
More

SGPTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGPTF has been loosely correlated with TGOLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGPTF jumps, then TGOLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGPTF
1D Price
Change %
SGPTF100%
+3.63%
TGOLF - SGPTF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MTRN - SGPTF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
HANCF - SGPTF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSM - SGPTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.83%
ERVFF - SGPTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More