BLIDF
Price
$31.07
Change
-$0.18 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
NTMFF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLIDF vs NTMFF

Header iconBLIDF vs NTMFF Comparison
Open Charts BLIDF vs NTMFFBanner chart's image
Boliden AB
Price$31.07
Change-$0.18 (-0.58%)
Volume$265
CapitalizationN/A
NEOTECH METALS
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$1.1K
CapitalizationN/A
BLIDF vs NTMFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLIDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLIDF vs. NTMFF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLIDF is a Hold and NTMFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BLIDF: $31.07 vs. NTMFF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: BLIDF and NTMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLIDF: 134% vs. NTMFF: 5%
Market capitalization -- BLIDF: $0 vs. NTMFF: $0
BLIDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $0. NTMFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLIDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTMFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLIDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLIDF is a better buy in the long-term than NTMFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLIDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTMFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLIDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NTMFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLIDF is a better buy in the short-term than NTMFF.

Price Growth

BLIDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while NTMFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTMFF YTD gains are higher at: 24.467 vs. BLIDF (12.579).
BLIDFNTMFFBLIDF / NTMFF
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.57924.46751%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLIDFNTMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLIDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AURA6.560.10
+1.55%
Aura Biosciences
BWLP12.500.13
+1.05%
BW LPG Ltd.
LNW99.520.37
+0.37%
Light & Wonder
QETAU10.84N/A
N/A
Quetta Acquisition Corp
MTEN9.80-0.45
-4.39%
Mingteng International Corp

BLIDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLIDF and CGNMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLIDF and CGNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLIDF
1D Price
Change %
BLIDF100%
N/A
CGNMF - BLIDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BATXF - BLIDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABAT - BLIDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
LAC - BLIDF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
SGPTF - BLIDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.63%
More

NTMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTMFF and GUELF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTMFF and GUELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTMFF
1D Price
Change %
NTMFF100%
-3.23%
GUELF - NTMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BATXF - NTMFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFUNF - NTMFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+4.89%
DTWOF - NTMFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLIDF - NTMFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More