BLHWF
Price
$963.01
Change
+$80.32 (+9.10%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.31B
CODGF
Price
$115.05
Change
+$7.75 (+7.22%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
34.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLHWF vs CODGF

Header iconBLHWF vs CODGF Comparison
Open Charts BLHWF vs CODGFBanner chart's image
Belimo Holding AG
Price$963.01
Change+$80.32 (+9.10%)
Volume$22
Capitalization6.31B
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain
Price$115.05
Change+$7.75 (+7.22%)
Volume$257
Capitalization34.53B
BLHWF vs CODGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLHWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CODGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLHWF vs. CODGF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLHWF is a Hold and CODGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BLHWF: $963.02 vs. CODGF: $115.05)
Brand notoriety: BLHWF and CODGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLHWF: 112% vs. CODGF: 19%
Market capitalization -- BLHWF: $6.31B vs. CODGF: $34.53B
BLHWF [@Building Products] is valued at $6.31B. CODGF’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $34.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $67.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLHWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCODGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLHWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CODGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CODGF is a better buy in the long-term than BLHWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLHWF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CODGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLHWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CODGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CODGF is a better buy in the short-term than BLHWF.

Price Growth

BLHWF (@Building Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CODGF (@Building Products) price change was +5.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+2.77% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CODGF($34.5B) has a higher market cap than BLHWF($6.31B). BLHWF has higher P/E ratio than CODGF: BLHWF (37.90) vs CODGF (11.51). BLHWF YTD gains are higher at: 41.887 vs. CODGF (28.345). CODGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.04B vs. BLHWF (180M). CODGF has more cash in the bank: 6.21B vs. BLHWF (113M). BLHWF has less debt than CODGF: BLHWF (9.54M) vs CODGF (14.7B). CODGF has higher revenues than BLHWF: CODGF (42.5B) vs BLHWF (859M).
BLHWFCODGFBLHWF / CODGF
Capitalization6.31B34.5B18%
EBITDA180M6.04B3%
Gain YTD41.88728.345148%
P/E Ratio37.9011.51329%
Revenue859M42.5B2%
Total Cash113M6.21B2%
Total Debt9.54M14.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLHWF vs CODGF: Fundamental Ratings
BLHWF
CODGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8917
SMR RATING
1..100
3898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1427
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CODGF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLHWF (95). This means that CODGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLHWF’s over the last 12 months.

CODGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLHWF (89). This means that CODGF’s stock grew significantly faster than BLHWF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHWF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CODGF (98). This means that BLHWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CODGF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHWF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CODGF (44). This means that BLHWF’s stock grew similarly to CODGF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHWF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as CODGF (27). This means that BLHWF’s stock grew similarly to CODGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLHWFCODGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLHWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CODGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSFE12.570.03
+0.24%
Paysafe Limited
TEX47.53-0.16
-0.34%
Terex Corp
CM69.68-0.88
-1.25%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
TRVG3.61-0.08
-2.17%
trivago NV
IMDX3.20-0.17
-5.04%
Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc

BLHWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLHWF and GBERY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLHWF and GBERY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLHWF
1D Price
Change %
BLHWF100%
N/A
GBERY - BLHWF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
CODGF - BLHWF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CODYY - BLHWF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
GBERF - BLHWF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DKILF - BLHWF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.62%
More

CODGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CODGF and NIABY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CODGF and NIABY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CODGF
1D Price
Change %
CODGF100%
N/A
NIABY - CODGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CODYY - CODGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
SWIM - CODGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
GBERY - CODGF
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
APEUF - CODGF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More