BLHEY
Price
$23.11
Change
+$0.76 (+3.40%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
7.01B
73 days until earnings call
MPFRF
Price
$3.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.38B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLHEY vs MPFRF

Header iconBLHEY vs MPFRF Comparison
Open Charts BLHEY vs MPFRFBanner chart's image
Baloise Holdings AG
Price$23.11
Change+$0.76 (+3.40%)
Volume$130
Capitalization7.01B
Mapfre SA
Price$3.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$190
Capitalization6.38B
BLHEY vs MPFRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLHEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLHEY vs. MPFRF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLHEY is a Hold and MPFRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BLHEY: $21.18 vs. MPFRF: $3.60)
Brand notoriety: BLHEY and MPFRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLHEY: 85% vs. MPFRF: 18%
Market capitalization -- BLHEY: $7.01B vs. MPFRF: $6.38B
BLHEY [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $7.01B. MPFRF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $6.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLHEY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMPFRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BLHEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MPFRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPFRF is a better buy in the long-term than BLHEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLHEY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPFRF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLHEY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MPFRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLHEY is a better buy in the short-term than MPFRF.

Price Growth

BLHEY (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MPFRF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLHEY is expected to report earnings on Sep 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.79% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLHEY($7.01B) has a higher market cap than MPFRF($6.39B). BLHEY has higher P/E ratio than MPFRF: BLHEY (11.03) vs MPFRF (8.55). MPFRF YTD gains are higher at: 35.084 vs. BLHEY (21.632). MPFRF has higher revenues than BLHEY: MPFRF (22.3B) vs BLHEY (7.45B).
BLHEYMPFRFBLHEY / MPFRF
Capitalization7.01B6.39B110%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.63235.08462%
P/E Ratio11.038.55129%
Revenue7.45B22.3B33%
Total CashN/A1.99B-
Total DebtN/A3.32B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLHEY vs MPFRF: Fundamental Ratings
BLHEY
MPFRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1213
SMR RATING
1..100
8728
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8139
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPFRF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as BLHEY (28). This means that MPFRF’s stock grew similarly to BLHEY’s over the last 12 months.

BLHEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as MPFRF (13). This means that BLHEY’s stock grew similarly to MPFRF’s over the last 12 months.

MPFRF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLHEY (87). This means that MPFRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLHEY’s over the last 12 months.

MPFRF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BLHEY (45). This means that MPFRF’s stock grew similarly to BLHEY’s over the last 12 months.

MPFRF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLHEY (81). This means that MPFRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLHEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLHEYMPFRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLHEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSO96.740.82
+0.85%
ProShares Ultra S&P500
JBK25.500.20
+0.79%
Lehman ABS Corp
SSUS44.680.18
+0.40%
Day Hagan Smart Sector ETF
ISWN20.550.08
+0.40%
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
BMN24.64-0.20
-0.81%
BlackRock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust

BLHEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLHEY and BLHEF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLHEY and BLHEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLHEY
1D Price
Change %
BLHEY100%
N/A
BLHEF - BLHEY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPFRF - BLHEY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXAHY - BLHEY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
BBSEY - BLHEY
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
GIVSY - BLHEY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MPFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MPFRF and SUND have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPFRF and SUND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPFRF
1D Price
Change %
MPFRF100%
N/A
SUND - MPFRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.92%
BLHEY - MPFRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXAHY - MPFRF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
IAFNF - MPFRF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIISY - MPFRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More