BLHEF
Price
$201.18
Change
+$29.00 (+16.84%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
MPFRF
Price
$2.67
Change
+$0.34 (+14.66%)
Updated
Nov 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

BLHEF vs MPFRF

Header iconBLHEF vs MPFRF Comparison
Open Charts BLHEF vs MPFRFBanner chart's image
Baloise Holdings AG
Price$201.18
Change+$29.00 (+16.84%)
Volume$525
CapitalizationN/A
Mapfre SA
Price$2.67
Change+$0.34 (+14.66%)
Volume$250
CapitalizationN/A
BLHEF vs MPFRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLHEF vs. MPFRF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLHEF is a Hold and MPFRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BLHEF: $201.18 vs. MPFRF: $2.66)
Brand notoriety: BLHEF and MPFRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLHEF: 100% vs. MPFRF: 31%
Market capitalization -- BLHEF: $7.01B vs. MPFRF: $6.38B
BLHEF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $7.01B. MPFRF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $6.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLHEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMPFRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLHEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MPFRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLHEF is a better buy in the long-term than MPFRF.

Price Growth

BLHEF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MPFRF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-2.82% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLHEF($7.01B) has a higher market cap than MPFRF($6.39B). BLHEF has higher P/E ratio than MPFRF: BLHEF (10.76) vs MPFRF (8.55). MPFRF YTD gains are higher at: 41.005 vs. BLHEF (36.625). BLHEF has more cash in the bank: 33.4B vs. MPFRF (1.99B). MPFRF has less debt than BLHEF: MPFRF (3.32B) vs BLHEF (5B). MPFRF has higher revenues than BLHEF: MPFRF (22.3B) vs BLHEF (8.25B).
BLHEFMPFRFBLHEF / MPFRF
Capitalization7.01B6.39B110%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.62541.00589%
P/E Ratio10.768.55126%
Revenue8.25B22.3B37%
Total Cash33.4B1.99B1,681%
Total Debt5B3.32B150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLHEF vs MPFRF: Fundamental Ratings
BLHEF
MPFRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5043
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
8791
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2975
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
506

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPFRF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BLHEF (27). This means that MPFRF’s stock grew similarly to BLHEF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MPFRF (100). This means that BLHEF’s stock grew similarly to MPFRF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHEF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as MPFRF (91). This means that BLHEF’s stock grew similarly to MPFRF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHEF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MPFRF (44). This means that BLHEF’s stock grew similarly to MPFRF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHEF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPFRF (75). This means that BLHEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPFRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

BLHEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLHEF and BLHEY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLHEF and BLHEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLHEF
1D Price
Change %
BLHEF100%
N/A
BLHEY - BLHEF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXAHF - BLHEF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
MPFRF - BLHEF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIISY - BLHEF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
GIVSY - BLHEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MPFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MPFRF and SUND have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPFRF and SUND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPFRF
1D Price
Change %
MPFRF100%
N/A
SUND - MPFRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.14%
BLHEY - MPFRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXAHY - MPFRF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
IAFNF - MPFRF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIISY - MPFRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More