BLFY
Price
$9.87
Change
+$0.10 (+1.02%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
227.8M
17 days until earnings call
PBCRF
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.08 (-13.56%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
74.49B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLFY vs PBCRF

Header iconBLFY vs PBCRF Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs PBCRFBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$9.87
Change+$0.10 (+1.02%)
Volume$39.63K
Capitalization227.8M
PT Bank Central Asia
Price$0.51
Change-$0.08 (-13.56%)
Volume$500
Capitalization74.49B
BLFY vs PBCRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. PBCRF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Hold and PBCRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BLFY: $9.87 vs. PBCRF: $0.51)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and PBCRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 69% vs. PBCRF: 13%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $227.8M vs. PBCRF: $74.49B
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $227.8M. PBCRF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $74.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePBCRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PBCRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBCRF is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBCRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PBCRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BLFY and PBCRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.71% price change this week, while PBCRF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBCRF($74.5B) has a higher market cap than BLFY($228M). BLFY has higher P/E ratio than PBCRF: BLFY (500.00) vs PBCRF (24.88). BLFY YTD gains are higher at: 0.612 vs. PBCRF (-10.526). BLFY has less debt than PBCRF: BLFY (424M) vs PBCRF (2.51T). PBCRF has higher revenues than BLFY: PBCRF (98.08T) vs BLFY (43.7M).
BLFYPBCRFBLFY / PBCRF
Capitalization228M74.5B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.612-10.526-6%
P/E Ratio500.0024.882,010%
Revenue43.7M98.08T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt424M2.51T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBCRF: Fundamental Ratings
PBCRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYPBCRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GENMF0.26N/A
+0.78%
Generation Mining Limited
SIERF0.07N/A
N/A
Sierra Grande Minerals Inc.
SPSTF0.44N/A
N/A
Singapore Post, Ltd.
BEIGF15.95N/A
N/A
BeiGene, Ltd.
OMRNY25.70-0.11
-0.45%
OMRON Corp.

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with AROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then AROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
+1.02%
AROW - BLFY
80%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
EQBK - BLFY
80%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
TCBK - BLFY
80%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
FMBH - BLFY
79%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
FCBC - BLFY
79%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
More

PBCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBCRF and PPERY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBCRF and PPERY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBCRF
1D Price
Change %
PBCRF100%
N/A
PPERY - PBCRF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
UOVEY - PBCRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
BLFY - PBCRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
FHN - PBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
PBCRY - PBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
More