BLFY
Price
$14.05
Change
-$0.09 (-0.64%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
293.56M
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MOFG
Price
$47.34
Change
-$0.18 (-0.38%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
976.83M
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLFY vs MOFG

Header iconBLFY vs MOFG Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs MOFGBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$14.05
Change-$0.09 (-0.64%)
Volume$305
Capitalization293.56M
MidWestOne Financial Gp
Price$47.34
Change-$0.18 (-0.38%)
Volume$221.81K
Capitalization976.83M
BLFY vs MOFG Comparison Chart in %
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MOFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. MOFG commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Buy and MOFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BLFY: $14.14 vs. MOFG: $47.34)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and MOFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 87% vs. MOFG: 111%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $293.56M vs. MOFG: $976.83M
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $293.56M. MOFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $976.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMOFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MOFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MOFG is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MOFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOFG is a better buy in the short-term than BLFY.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.04% price change this week, while MOFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

MOFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOFG($977M) has a higher market cap than BLFY($294M). MOFG YTD gains are higher at: 23.671 vs. BLFY (13.757). MOFG has less debt than BLFY: MOFG (98M) vs BLFY (324M). MOFG has higher revenues than BLFY: MOFG (239M) vs BLFY (45.7M).
BLFYMOFGBLFY / MOFG
Capitalization294M977M30%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.75723.67158%
P/E RatioN/A14.13-
Revenue45.7M239M19%
Total CashN/A67.1M-
Total Debt324M98M331%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MOFG: Fundamental Ratings
MOFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
30
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYMOFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MOFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCMGX33.420.05
+0.15%
OCM Gold Investor
LEAOX17.15-0.02
-0.12%
Lazard Emerging Markets Eq Advtg Open
BGEIX35.54-0.05
-0.14%
American Century Global Gold Inv
RIEAX12.88-0.05
-0.39%
RBC International Equity A
PJFZX67.70-1.18
-1.71%
PGIM Jennison Growth Z

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with HTBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then HTBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
+2.69%
HTBK - BLFY
87%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
FSBC - BLFY
86%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
EBMT - BLFY
85%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
CAC - BLFY
84%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
TRST - BLFY
83%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More

MOFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with HTBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then HTBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOFG
1D Price
Change %
MOFG100%
-0.38%
HTBK - MOFG
92%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
BLFY - MOFG
91%
Closely correlated
+2.69%
PKBK - MOFG
91%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
CAC - MOFG
89%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
AROW - MOFG
89%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
More