BLFY
Price
$9.36
Change
-$0.05 (-0.53%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
201.2M
25 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$28.69
Change
-$0.11 (-0.38%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
732.68M
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLFY vs MCBS

Header iconBLFY vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs MCBSBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$9.36
Change-$0.05 (-0.53%)
Volume$24.25K
Capitalization201.2M
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$28.69
Change-$0.11 (-0.38%)
Volume$21.98K
Capitalization732.68M
BLFY vs MCBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. MCBS commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Buy and MCBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BLFY: $9.36 vs. MCBS: $28.69)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 47% vs. MCBS: 64%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $201.2M vs. MCBS: $732.68M
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $201.2M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $732.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLFY is a better buy in the short-term than MCBS.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.63% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($733M) has a higher market cap than BLFY($201M). BLFY YTD gains are higher at: -4.587 vs. MCBS (-8.006). BLFY has less debt than MCBS: BLFY (367M) vs MCBS (433M). MCBS has higher revenues than BLFY: MCBS (145M) vs BLFY (42.6M).
BLFYMCBSBLFY / MCBS
Capitalization201M733M27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.587-8.00657%
P/E RatioN/A11.16-
Revenue42.6M145M29%
Total CashN/A279M-
Total Debt367M433M85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLHCX22.010.21
+0.96%
Macquarie Healthcare C
GBCIX19.080.18
+0.95%
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
NYVTX27.920.24
+0.87%
Davis NY Venture A
GSTTX15.420.04
+0.26%
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Inv
TEMSX9.84-0.10
-1.01%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq Retiremt

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
-0.53%
FMBH - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
TCBK - BLFY
77%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
UBSI - BLFY
76%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
MCBS - BLFY
76%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
AROW - BLFY
76%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with IBCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then IBCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
-0.38%
IBCP - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
SMBC - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
CTBI - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
TCBK - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
SBSI - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
More