BLFY
Price
$9.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
204.21M
45 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$29.49
Change
-$0.45 (-1.50%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
753.11M
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLFY vs MCBS

Header iconBLFY vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs MCBSBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$9.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$39.1K
Capitalization204.21M
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$29.49
Change-$0.45 (-1.50%)
Volume$35.89K
Capitalization753.11M
BLFY vs MCBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. MCBS commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a StrongBuy and MCBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BLFY: $9.50 vs. MCBS: $29.49)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 81% vs. MCBS: 102%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $204.21M vs. MCBS: $753.11M
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $204.21M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $753.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the short-term than BLFY.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.26% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($753M) has a higher market cap than BLFY($204M). BLFY YTD gains are higher at: -3.160 vs. MCBS (-5.441). BLFY has less debt than MCBS: BLFY (367M) vs MCBS (433M). MCBS has higher revenues than BLFY: MCBS (145M) vs BLFY (42.6M).
BLFYMCBSBLFY / MCBS
Capitalization204M753M27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.160-5.44158%
P/E RatioN/A11.47-
Revenue42.6M145M29%
Total CashN/A279M-
Total Debt367M433M85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLYBY4.47N/A
N/A
Malayan Banking Berhad
WBBW34.00N/A
N/A
Westbury Bancorp, Inc.
ACNFF25.46N/A
N/A
Amsterdam Commodities N.V.
DLPTF0.09N/A
N/A
LIAONING PORT CO LTD.
BVAXF0.02N/A
-2.91%
BioVaxys Technology Corp.

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
N/A
FMBH - BLFY
79%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
TCBK - BLFY
79%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
FCBC - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
AROW - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
MCBS - BLFY
77%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with SMBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then SMBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
-1.50%
SMBC - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
CTBI - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
SBSI - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
TCBK - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
IBCP - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
More