BLFY
Price
$14.05
Change
-$0.09 (-0.64%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
293.56M
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSBC
Price
$41.13
Change
+$0.08 (+0.19%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
878.99M
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLFY vs FSBC

Header iconBLFY vs FSBC Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs FSBCBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$14.05
Change-$0.09 (-0.64%)
Volume$305
Capitalization293.56M
Five Star Ban
Price$41.13
Change+$0.08 (+0.19%)
Volume$200
Capitalization878.99M
BLFY vs FSBC Comparison Chart in %
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. FSBC commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Buy and FSBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BLFY: $14.14 vs. FSBC: $41.05)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and FSBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 87% vs. FSBC: 123%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $293.56M vs. FSBC: $878.99M
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $293.56M. FSBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $878.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSBC is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSBC is a better buy in the short-term than BLFY.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.04% price change this week, while FSBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

FSBC is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSBC($879M) has a higher market cap than BLFY($294M). FSBC YTD gains are higher at: 15.457 vs. BLFY (13.757). FSBC has less debt than BLFY: FSBC (84.4M) vs BLFY (324M). FSBC has higher revenues than BLFY: FSBC (149M) vs BLFY (45.7M).
BLFYFSBCBLFY / FSBC
Capitalization294M879M33%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.75715.45789%
P/E RatioN/A14.18-
Revenue45.7M149M31%
Total CashN/A44.1M-
Total Debt324M84.4M384%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYFSBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIVHX31.120.26
+0.84%
Cutler Equity Fund
PXWEX35.010.13
+0.37%
Impax Ellevate Global Women's Ldr Inv
EMCAX69.300.10
+0.14%
Empiric Class A
MIDAX33.55-0.02
-0.06%
MFS International New Discovery A
JIGZX85.42-1.21
-1.40%
JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity R2

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with HTBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then HTBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
+2.69%
HTBK - BLFY
87%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
FSBC - BLFY
86%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
EBMT - BLFY
85%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
CAC - BLFY
84%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
TRST - BLFY
83%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More

FSBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBC has been closely correlated with AROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBC jumps, then AROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBC
1D Price
Change %
FSBC100%
+1.08%
AROW - FSBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
TRST - FSBC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
THFF - FSBC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
QCRH - FSBC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
TCBK - FSBC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
More