BLFY
Price
$12.55
Change
-$0.05 (-0.40%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
260.55M
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMBH
Price
$41.97
Change
-$0.06 (-0.14%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLFY vs FMBH

Header iconBLFY vs FMBH Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs FMBHBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$12.55
Change-$0.05 (-0.40%)
Volume$169.35K
Capitalization260.55M
First Mid Bancshares
Price$41.97
Change-$0.06 (-0.14%)
Volume$100.9K
Capitalization1.01B
BLFY vs FMBH Comparison Chart in %
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. FMBH commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Buy and FMBH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BLFY: $12.60 vs. FMBH: $42.03)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and FMBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 238% vs. FMBH: 129%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $260.55M vs. FMBH: $1.01B
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $260.55M. FMBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMBH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMBH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FMBH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the short-term than BLFY.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.26% price change this week, while FMBH (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($1.01B) has a higher market cap than BLFY($261M). BLFY YTD gains are higher at: 28.440 vs. FMBH (16.365). BLFY has less debt than FMBH: BLFY (324M) vs FMBH (363M). FMBH has higher revenues than BLFY: FMBH (339M) vs BLFY (45.7M).
BLFYFMBHBLFY / FMBH
Capitalization261M1.01B26%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.44016.365174%
P/E RatioN/A11.50-
Revenue45.7M339M13%
Total CashN/A16.1M-
Total Debt324M363M89%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBH: Fundamental Ratings
FMBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51
SMR RATING
1..100
25
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYFMBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGIKX15.050.03
+0.20%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha K
LGLCX46.36-0.12
-0.26%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
AIGGX14.59-0.05
-0.34%
Aristotle Growth Equity I-2
LSHAX26.72-0.14
-0.52%
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv A
JDVRX23.60-2.18
-8.46%
PGIM Jennison Value R

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been loosely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
+0.16%
TCBK - BLFY
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
FMBH - BLFY
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
DCOM - BLFY
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
VLY - BLFY
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
CCNE - BLFY
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
More

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
+1.25%
TCBK - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
CTBI - FMBH
88%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
UBSI - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
BUSE - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
BY - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
More