BLFY
Price
$14.22
Change
+$0.08 (+0.57%)
Updated
Feb 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
293.56M
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
COSO
Price
$25.19
Change
-$0.10 (-0.40%)
Updated
Feb 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
302.97M
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLFY vs COSO

Header iconBLFY vs COSO Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs COSOBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$14.22
Change+$0.08 (+0.57%)
Volume$2.48K
Capitalization293.56M
CoastalSouth Bancshares
Price$25.19
Change-$0.10 (-0.40%)
Volume$2.89K
Capitalization302.97M
BLFY vs COSO Comparison Chart in %
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
COSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. COSO commentary
Feb 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Buy and COSO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 06, 2026
Stock price -- (BLFY: $14.14 vs. COSO: $25.29)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and COSO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 87% vs. COSO: 142%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $293.56M vs. COSO: $302.97M
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $293.56M. COSO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $302.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCOSO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • COSO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COSO is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COSO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • COSO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COSO is a better buy in the short-term than BLFY.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.04% price change this week, while COSO (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

COSO is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COSO($303M) and BLFY($294M) have the same market capitalization . BLFY YTD gains are higher at: 13.757 vs. COSO (8.774). COSO has less debt than BLFY: COSO (25M) vs BLFY (324M). COSO has higher revenues than BLFY: COSO (70.5M) vs BLFY (45.7M).
BLFYCOSOBLFY / COSO
Capitalization294M303M97%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.7578.774157%
P/E RatioN/A12.17-
Revenue45.7M70.5M65%
Total CashN/A21.4M-
Total Debt324M25M1,296%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COSO: Fundamental Ratings
COSO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYCOSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
24%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
COSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LNXSF22.421.32
+6.26%
Lanxess Ag
WHGPF0.54N/A
N/A
Warehouse Group (THE)
SSAAF7.99N/A
N/A
SSab Swedish Steel AB
NTMFF0.18N/A
N/A
NEOTECH METALS CORP
NGGTF17.29-0.81
-4.48%
National Grid PLC

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with HTBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then HTBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
+2.69%
HTBK - BLFY
87%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
FSBC - BLFY
86%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
EBMT - BLFY
85%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
CAC - BLFY
84%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
TRST - BLFY
83%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More

COSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COSO has been loosely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COSO jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COSO
1D Price
Change %
COSO100%
+1.61%
BSAC - COSO
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
CIB - COSO
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.73%
AMBK - COSO
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BLFY - COSO
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
CZWI - COSO
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
More