BLFY vs CFB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a StrongBuy and CFB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCFB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLFY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLFY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CFB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while CFB (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLFY is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
CFB is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.77% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BLFY | CFB | BLFY / CFB | |
| Capitalization | 228M | 684M | 33% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.236 | 27.761 | 58% |
| P/E Ratio | 500.00 | 10.12 | 4,941% |
| Revenue | 43.7M | 245M | 18% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 424M | 86.8M | 488% |
| BLFY | CFB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 0% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 54% |
BLFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with CFB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then CFB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLFY | 100% | +1.63% | ||
| CFB - BLFY | 73% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| CCB - BLFY | 72% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| TCBI - BLFY | 69% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| CLBK - BLFY | 68% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| CARE - BLFY | 68% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
More | ||||
CFB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFB has been closely correlated with TCBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFB jumps, then TCBI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFB | 100% | -1.36% | ||
| TCBI - CFB | 74% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| AX - CFB | 73% Closely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| BLFY - CFB | 73% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| CCB - CFB | 72% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| MCB - CFB | 71% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||