It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
BLFS (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +9.52% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.67%.
BLFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
BLFS | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLFS | PSCH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago77% | 7 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago85% | 14 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFS has been loosely correlated with RGEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLFS jumps, then RGEN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BLFS | 100% | +0.66% | ||
RGEN - BLFS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
A - BLFS | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
RVTY - BLFS | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
TWST - BLFS | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
AZTA - BLFS | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSCH has been closely correlated with ITGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSCH jumps, then ITGR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PSCH | 100% | -0.21% | ||
ITGR - PSCH | 71% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
ENOV - PSCH | 66% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
GKOS - PSCH | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
BLFS - PSCH | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
RDNT - PSCH | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
More |