Advertisement
BLFS vs BSGM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFS is a StrongBuy and BSGM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBSGM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BLFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BSGM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLFS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BSGM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BSGM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BLFS (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +5.63% price change this week, while BSGM (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -7.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.74%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.00% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (+0.09% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| BLFS | BSGM | BLFS / BSGM | |
| Capitalization | 1.27B | 156M | 813% |
| EBITDA | 17.4M | -28M | -62% |
| Gain YTD | 1.926 | 195.973 | 1% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 93.5M | 13K | 719,231% |
| Total Cash | 81.8M | 2.82M | 2,901% |
| Total Debt | 23.8M | 15K | 158,667% |
BLFS | BSGM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BSGM's Valuation (97) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BLFS (99). This means that BSGM’s stock grew similarly to BLFS’s over the last 12 months.
BLFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BSGM (100). This means that BLFS’s stock grew similarly to BSGM’s over the last 12 months.
BLFS's SMR Rating (92) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BSGM (100). This means that BLFS’s stock grew similarly to BSGM’s over the last 12 months.
BSGM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BLFS (44). This means that BSGM’s stock grew similarly to BLFS’s over the last 12 months.
BLFS's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSGM (100). This means that BLFS’s stock grew significantly faster than BSGM’s over the last 12 months.
| BLFS | BSGM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 15 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
BSGM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BSGM and ISRG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSGM and ISRG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSGM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSGM | 100% | -3.50% | ||
| ISRG - BSGM | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.71% | ||
| MASI - BSGM | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.92% | ||
| IRTC - BSGM | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
| PAVM - BSGM | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| BLFS - BSGM | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.28% | ||
More | ||||