Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLES vs CGDG
BLES vs CGDG Comparison
Open Charts BLES vs CGDG
Inspire Global Hope ETF
Price$45.29
Change+$2.75 (+6.46%)
Volume$4.98K
Net Assets139.83M
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Price$36.51
Change+$1.79 (+5.16%)
Volume$1.02M
Net Assets4.44B
BLES vs CGDG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLES vs. CGDG commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLES is a Hold and CGDG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGDG has more net assets: 4.44B vs. BLES (140M). BLES has a higher annual dividend yield than CGDG: BLES (4.820) vs CGDG (2.441). BLES was incepted earlier than CGDG: BLES (9 years) vs CGDG (2 years). CGDG (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BLES (0.58). BLES has a higher turnover CGDG (25.00) vs CGDG (25.00).
| BLES | CGDG | BLES / CGDG | |
| Gain YTD | 4.820 | 2.441 | 197% |
| Net Assets | 140M | 4.44B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.47 | 123% |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 25.00 | 164% |
| Yield | 1.88 | 1.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BLES | CGDG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BLES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLES has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLES jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLES | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| BN - BLES | 81% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| DOV - BLES | 78% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| NDSN - BLES | 76% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| PH - BLES | 74% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| QCOM - BLES | 74% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
More | ||||
CGDG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGDG has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGDG jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDG | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| BN - CGDG | 76% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| MS - CGDG | 67% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| KLAC - CGDG | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| BR - CGDG | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.25% | ||
| REXR - CGDG | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||