Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLES vs CGDG
BLES vs CGDG Comparison
Open Charts BLES vs CGDG
Inspire Global Hope ETF
Price$43.23
Change+$0.33 (+0.77%)
Volume$100
Net Assets126.94M
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Price$35.63
Change+$0.27 (+0.76%)
Volume$7.93K
Net Assets3.82B
BLES vs CGDG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLES vs. CGDG commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLES is a Hold and CGDG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGDG has more net assets: 3.82B vs. BLES (127M). CGDG has a higher annual dividend yield than BLES: CGDG (21.190) vs BLES (17.955). BLES was incepted earlier than CGDG: BLES (9 years) vs CGDG (2 years). CGDG (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BLES (0.58). BLES has a higher turnover CGDG (25.00) vs CGDG (25.00).
| BLES | CGDG | BLES / CGDG | |
| Gain YTD | 17.955 | 21.190 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 127M | 3.82B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.47 | 123% |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 25.00 | 164% |
| Yield | 1.65 | 1.90 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BLES | CGDG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 75% | 14 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BLES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLES has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLES jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLES | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| BN - BLES | 81% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| NDSN - BLES | 77% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| PH - BLES | 74% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| DOV - BLES | 74% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| QCOM - BLES | 74% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
More | ||||
CGDG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGDG has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGDG jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDG | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| BN - CGDG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| MS - CGDG | 68% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| REXR - CGDG | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| KLAC - CGDG | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| BR - CGDG | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||