BLDR
Price
$122.54
Change
-$0.41 (-0.33%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
13.55B
11 days until earnings call
NRTZF
Price
$11.18
Change
+$0.13 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
606.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLDR vs NRTZF

Header iconBLDR vs NRTZF Comparison
Open Charts BLDR vs NRTZFBanner chart's image
Builders FirstSource
Price$122.54
Change-$0.41 (-0.33%)
Volume$1.62M
Capitalization13.55B
Noritz
Price$11.18
Change+$0.13 (+1.18%)
Volume$100
Capitalization606.33M
BLDR vs NRTZF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLDR vs. NRTZF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLDR is a Hold and NRTZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BLDR: $122.54 vs. NRTZF: $11.18)
Brand notoriety: BLDR and NRTZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLDR: 84% vs. NRTZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BLDR: $13.55B vs. NRTZF: $606.33M
BLDR [@Building Products] is valued at $13.55B. NRTZF’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $606.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $92.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLDR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNRTZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NRTZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLDR is a better buy in the long-term than NRTZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLDR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BLDR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BLDR (@Building Products) experienced а +0.03% price change this week, while NRTZF (@Building Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLDR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+0.71% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLDR($13.5B) has a higher market cap than NRTZF($606M). BLDR has higher P/E ratio than NRTZF: BLDR (18.54) vs NRTZF (16.89). NRTZF YTD gains are higher at: 1.176 vs. BLDR (-14.266). NRTZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.6B vs. BLDR (1.8B). NRTZF has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. BLDR (87M). NRTZF has less debt than BLDR: NRTZF (3.64B) vs BLDR (5.32B). NRTZF has higher revenues than BLDR: NRTZF (205B) vs BLDR (15.9B).
BLDRNRTZFBLDR / NRTZF
Capitalization13.5B606M2,228%
EBITDA1.8B17.6B10%
Gain YTD-14.2661.176-1,213%
P/E Ratio18.5416.89110%
Revenue15.9B205B8%
Total Cash87M29.3B0%
Total Debt5.32B3.64B146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLDR vs NRTZF: Fundamental Ratings
BLDR
NRTZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4984
SMR RATING
1..100
4934
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NRTZF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLDR (62) in the Building Products industry. This means that NRTZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLDR’s over the last 12 months.

BLDR's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NRTZF (84) in the null industry. This means that BLDR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NRTZF’s over the last 12 months.

NRTZF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BLDR (49) in the Building Products industry. This means that NRTZF’s stock grew similarly to BLDR’s over the last 12 months.

NRTZF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BLDR (63) in the Building Products industry. This means that NRTZF’s stock grew similarly to BLDR’s over the last 12 months.

BLDR's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for NRTZF (100) in the null industry. This means that BLDR’s stock grew significantly faster than NRTZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLDRNRTZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LVAMX11.440.10
+0.88%
LSV US Managed Volatility Investor
CLVRX35.720.22
+0.62%
Calvert US Large Cap Value Rspnb Idx R6
NWHOX31.670.09
+0.28%
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci A
EGOAX20.260.05
+0.25%
Allspring Large Cap Core A
FOSFX75.07-0.06
-0.08%
Fidelity Overseas

BLDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLDR has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLDR jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLDR
1D Price
Change %
BLDR100%
-0.33%
FBIN - BLDR
78%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
MAS - BLDR
77%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
BXC - BLDR
76%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
OC - BLDR
72%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
TREX - BLDR
70%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
More

NRTZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRTZF and OC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRTZF and OC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRTZF
1D Price
Change %
NRTZF100%
N/A
OC - NRTZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
FBIN - NRTZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
BLDR - NRTZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
NIABY - NRTZF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBI - NRTZF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More