BLD
Price
$480.56
Change
+$54.76 (+12.86%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.49B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
J
Price
$132.91
Change
-$22.53 (-14.49%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.7B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLD vs J

Header iconBLD vs J Comparison
Open Charts BLD vs JBanner chart's image
TopBuild
Price$480.56
Change+$54.76 (+12.86%)
Volume$297.84K
Capitalization13.49B
Jacobs Solutions
Price$132.91
Change-$22.53 (-14.49%)
Volume$1.39M
Capitalization15.7B
BLD vs J Comparison Chart in %
BLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
J
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLD vs. J commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLD is a Buy and J is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (BLD: $480.56 vs. J: $132.91)
Brand notoriety: BLD and J are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLD: 101% vs. J: 157%
Market capitalization -- BLD: $13.49B vs. J: $15.7B
BLD [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $13.49B. J’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $15.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $9.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • J’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLD is a better buy in the long-term than J.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while J’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • J’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLD is a better buy in the short-term than J.

Price Growth

BLD (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.00% price change this week, while J (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -2.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLD is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

J is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.43% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
J($15.7B) has a higher market cap than BLD($13.5B). J has higher P/E ratio than BLD: J (35.07) vs BLD (24.44). BLD YTD gains are higher at: 15.190 vs. J (0.340). BLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 995M vs. J (927M). J has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. BLD (1.14B). J has less debt than BLD: J (2.71B) vs BLD (3.09B). J has higher revenues than BLD: J (12B) vs BLD (5.24B).
BLDJBLD / J
Capitalization13.5B15.7B86%
EBITDA995M927M107%
Gain YTD15.1900.3404,471%
P/E Ratio24.4435.0770%
Revenue5.24B12B44%
Total Cash1.14B1.24B92%
Total Debt3.09B2.71B114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLD vs J: Fundamental Ratings
BLD
J
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7659
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3645
SMR RATING
1..100
3678
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1730
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

J's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as BLD (76) in the Building Products industry. This means that J’s stock grew similarly to BLD’s over the last 12 months.

BLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as J (45) in the null industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew similarly to J’s over the last 12 months.

BLD's SMR Rating (36) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for J (78) in the null industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than J’s over the last 12 months.

BLD's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as J (61) in the null industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew similarly to J’s over the last 12 months.

BLD's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as J (30) in the null industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew similarly to J’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLDJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
J
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTAL14.140.05
+0.35%
AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta
CAFX24.980.01
+0.02%
Congress Intermediate Bond ETF
OOSP10.16-0.02
-0.25%
Obra Opportunistic Structured Prdcts ETF
NAC11.92-0.06
-0.50%
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
FLSW42.80-0.28
-0.65%
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF

BLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLD has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLD jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLD
1D Price
Change %
BLD100%
+3.54%
ACM - BLD
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
ACA - BLD
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
EXPO - BLD
45%
Loosely correlated
-5.08%
J - BLD
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.90%
APG - BLD
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More

J and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, J has been closely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if J jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To J
1D Price
Change %
J100%
-2.90%
ACM - J
72%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
APG - J
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
ACA - J
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
MTZ - J
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
KBR - J
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
More