Advertisement
BLD vs GSFP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLD is a StrongBuy and GSFP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- BLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BLD (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +7.73% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +4.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +509.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+4.64% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
BLD | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BLD | GSFP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 19 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 73% | 11 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CAPE | 32.30 | 0.06 | +0.19% |
| DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF | |||
| QBUL | 25.63 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF | |||
| SDSI | 51.37 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
| American Century® Short Dur Str Inc ETF | |||
| GAM | 57.59 | 0.04 | +0.07% |
| General American Investors Company | |||
| JHID | 34.73 | -0.10 | -0.27% |
| JHancock International High Dividend ETF | |||
BLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLD has been loosely correlated with ACA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLD jumps, then ACA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLD | 100% | +1.88% | ||
| ACA - BLD | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| EXPO - BLD | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| APG - BLD | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| GVA - BLD | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| BWMN - BLD | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||
GSFP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSFP has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSFP jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSFP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSFP | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACM - GSFP | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| VLTO - GSFP | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ETN - GSFP | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| WMS - GSFP | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| BLD - GSFP | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
More | ||||