It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLCO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BLCO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +5.53% price change this week, while RMD (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +3.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.19%.
BLCO is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
RMD is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| BLCO | RMD | BLCO / RMD | |
| Capitalization | 5.56B | 36.8B | 15% |
| EBITDA | 454M | 1.92B | 24% |
| Gain YTD | -8.084 | 11.289 | -72% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 25.80 | - |
| Revenue | 4.89B | 5.15B | 95% |
| Total Cash | 266M | 1.21B | 22% |
| Total Debt | 4.96B | 852M | 582% |
RMD | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BLCO | RMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 55% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| USSG | 63.56 | 0.12 | +0.19% |
| Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Eq ETF | |||
| SROI | 33.83 | 0.04 | +0.11% |
| Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sus Eqs ETF | |||
| DEW | 60.87 | N/A | N/A |
| WisdomTree Global High Dividend ETF | |||
| BSCR | 19.74 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corp Bd ETF | |||
| XCNY | 28.25 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLCO has been loosely correlated with CRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLCO jumps, then CRL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLCO | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| CRL - BLCO | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| MTD - BLCO | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| RVTY - BLCO | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| A - BLCO | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| RMD - BLCO | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMD has been loosely correlated with SOLV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMD jumps, then SOLV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMD | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| SOLV - RMD | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| NVST - RMD | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| BLCO - RMD | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| RVTY - RMD | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| SYK - RMD | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
More | ||||