Advertisement
BLBX vs NDATF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLBX is a StrongBuy and NDATF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLBX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDATF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BLBX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NDATF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLBX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDATF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLBX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NDATF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
BLBX (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.63% price change this week, while NDATF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.83%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.49% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| BLBX | NDATF | BLBX / NDATF | |
| Capitalization | 23.9M | 451K | 5,299% |
| EBITDA | -3.42M | -469.05K | 729% |
| Gain YTD | 197.273 | -81.833 | -241% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.51M | 887 | 282,413% |
| Total Cash | 215K | 499K | 43% |
| Total Debt | 1.16M | N/A | - |
BLBX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BLBX | NDATF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 16% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 16% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
Advertisement
BLBX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLBX has been loosely correlated with REKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLBX jumps, then REKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLBX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLBX | 100% | -2.24% | ||
| REKR - BLBX | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| VS - BLBX | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.60% | ||
| NEMTF - BLBX | 28% Poorly correlated | +13.40% | ||
| MSFT - BLBX | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
| FMZNF - BLBX | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NDATF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDATF has been closely correlated with NEMTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDATF jumps, then NEMTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDATF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDATF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NEMTF - NDATF | 71% Closely correlated | +13.40% | ||
| YMM - NDATF | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.67% | ||
| BTRCF - NDATF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| THNCF - NDATF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BLBX - NDATF | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
More | ||||