BLBX
Price
$2.94
Change
+$0.04 (+1.38%)
Updated
Apr 7, 03:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.1M
FMZNF
Price
$0.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 17 closing price
Capitalization
174.1M
Ad is loading...

BLBX vs FMZNF

Header iconBLBX vs FMZNF Comparison
Open Charts BLBX vs FMZNFBanner chart's image
Blackboxstocks
Price$2.94
Change+$0.04 (+1.38%)
Volume$275
Capitalization8.1M
QORIA
Price$0.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization174.1M
BLBX vs FMZNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLBX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLBX vs. FMZNF commentary
Apr 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLBX is a Buy and FMZNF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BLBX: $2.90 vs. FMZNF: $0.50)
Brand notoriety: BLBX and FMZNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLBX: 17% vs. FMZNF: 4%
Market capitalization -- BLBX: $8.1M vs. FMZNF: $174.1M
BLBX [@Packaged Software] is valued at $8.1M. FMZNF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $174.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLBX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMZNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLBX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FMZNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMZNF is a better buy in the long-term than BLBX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLBX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BLBX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BLBX (@Packaged Software) experienced а -16.91% price change this week, while FMZNF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLBX is expected to report earnings on Aug 22, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.30% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMZNF($174M) has a higher market cap than BLBX($8.1M). FMZNF YTD gains are higher at: 46.667 vs. BLBX (31.818). BLBX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.09M vs. FMZNF (-53.63M). FMZNF has more cash in the bank: 34.9M vs. BLBX (466K). BLBX has less debt than FMZNF: BLBX (329K) vs FMZNF (3.31M). FMZNF has higher revenues than BLBX: FMZNF (63.7M) vs BLBX (3.39M).
BLBXFMZNFBLBX / FMZNF
Capitalization8.1M174M5%
EBITDA-5.09M-53.63M9%
Gain YTD31.81846.66768%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue3.39M63.7M5%
Total Cash466K34.9M1%
Total Debt329K3.31M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLBX vs FMZNF: Fundamental Ratings
BLBX
FMZNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
248
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
9795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLBX's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FMZNF (45). This means that BLBX’s stock grew similarly to FMZNF’s over the last 12 months.

FMZNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLBX (100). This means that FMZNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLBX’s over the last 12 months.

FMZNF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as BLBX (97). This means that FMZNF’s stock grew similarly to BLBX’s over the last 12 months.

FMZNF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BLBX (37). This means that FMZNF’s stock grew similarly to BLBX’s over the last 12 months.

FMZNF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BLBX (100). This means that FMZNF’s stock grew similarly to BLBX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLBX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLBX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.492.39
+11.33%
GameStop Corp
SPY505.28-31.42
-5.85%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X78214.484000-5290.312500
-6.34%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL188.38-14.81
-7.29%
Apple
TSLA239.43-27.85
-10.42%
Tesla

BLBX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLBX and REKR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLBX and REKR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLBX
1D Price
Change %
BLBX100%
-7.94%
REKR - BLBX
30%
Poorly correlated
-10.24%
VS - BLBX
30%
Poorly correlated
-7.11%
NEMTF - BLBX
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMR - BLBX
27%
Poorly correlated
-8.70%
MSFT - BLBX
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.56%
More

FMZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMZNF and HSTM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMZNF and HSTM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMZNF
1D Price
Change %
FMZNF100%
N/A
HSTM - FMZNF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGYS - FMZNF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
BLBX - FMZNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.94%
BNZI - FMZNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LDTC - FMZNF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More