BLAGF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.03 (-5.36%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
76.85M
RRDMF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.01 (-6.25%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
37.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLAGF vs RRDMF

Header iconBLAGF vs RRDMF Comparison
Open Charts BLAGF vs RRDMFBanner chart's image
Blue Lagoon Resources
Price$0.53
Change-$0.03 (-5.36%)
Volume$261.33K
Capitalization76.85M
Royal Road Minerals
Price$0.15
Change-$0.01 (-6.25%)
Volume$26.9K
Capitalization37.83M
BLAGF vs RRDMF Comparison Chart in %
BLAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLAGF vs. RRDMF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLAGF is a Hold and RRDMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BLAGF: $0.53 vs. RRDMF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: BLAGF and RRDMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLAGF: 148% vs. RRDMF: 40%
Market capitalization -- BLAGF: $76.85M vs. RRDMF: $39.72M
BLAGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $76.85M. RRDMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $39.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $113.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRRDMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RRDMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RRDMF is a better buy in the long-term than BLAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLAGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRDMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLAGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RRDMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLAGF is a better buy in the short-term than RRDMF.

Price Growth

BLAGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.34% price change this week, while RRDMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1211.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.66% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLAGF($76.9M) has a higher market cap than RRDMF($37.8M). BLAGF YTD gains are higher at: 421.561 vs. RRDMF (50.400). BLAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.08M vs. RRDMF (-3.7M). RRDMF has more cash in the bank: 4.67M vs. BLAGF (284K). BLAGF (0) and RRDMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BLAGFRRDMFBLAGF / RRDMF
Capitalization76.9M37.8M203%
EBITDA-1.08M-3.7M29%
Gain YTD421.56150.400836%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash284K4.67M6%
Total DebtN/A23.6K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLAGF vs RRDMF: Fundamental Ratings
BLAGF
RRDMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1984
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8880
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RRDMF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as BLAGF (74). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew similarly to BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

RRDMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BLAGF (100). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew similarly to BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

RRDMF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BLAGF (100). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew similarly to BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

RRDMF's Price Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as BLAGF (88). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew similarly to BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

RRDMF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as BLAGF (100). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew similarly to BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLAGFRRDMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VOPKF46.052.65
+6.11%
Koninklijke Vopak NV
KMTUF35.900.20
+0.56%
Komatsu Ltd.
JAXAF0.04N/A
N/A
VINYL GROUP LTD.
RNDXF0.04N/A
N/A
Randgold & Exploration Company Limited
APPIF10.44N/A
N/A
APPIER GROUP INC.

BLAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLAGF and KNTNF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLAGF and KNTNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLAGF
1D Price
Change %
BLAGF100%
-3.77%
KNTNF - BLAGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.98%
DPMLF - BLAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
RRDMF - BLAGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
BONXF - BLAGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
BGUUF - BLAGF
1%
Poorly correlated
-33.33%
More

RRDMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RRDMF and PAFRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RRDMF and PAFRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRDMF
1D Price
Change %
RRDMF100%
-4.75%
PAFRF - RRDMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+13.04%
PMCCF - RRDMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WGXRF - RRDMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
BLAGF - RRDMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
RUPRF - RRDMF
15%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
More