BLAGF
Price
$0.50
Change
+$0.01 (+2.04%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
70.88M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BONXF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
28.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLAGF vs BONXF

Header iconBLAGF vs BONXF Comparison
Open Charts BLAGF vs BONXFBanner chart's image
Blue Lagoon Resources
Price$0.50
Change+$0.01 (+2.04%)
Volume$32.71K
Capitalization70.88M
Bonterra Resources
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$33.58K
Capitalization28.04M
BLAGF vs BONXF Comparison Chart in %
BLAGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BONXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLAGF vs. BONXF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLAGF is a Hold and BONXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BLAGF: $0.50 vs. BONXF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: BLAGF and BONXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLAGF: 16% vs. BONXF: 13%
Market capitalization -- BLAGF: $70.88M vs. BONXF: $28.04M
BLAGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $70.88M. BONXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $28.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $115.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBONXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BONXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BLAGF and BONXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLAGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BONXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLAGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BONXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLAGF is a better buy in the short-term than BONXF.

Price Growth

BLAGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.02% price change this week, while BONXF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8543.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.93% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLAGF($70.9M) has a higher market cap than BONXF($28M). BLAGF YTD gains are higher at: 386.927 vs. BONXF (-14.557). BLAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.08M vs. BONXF (-8.42M). BONXF has more cash in the bank: 8.49M vs. BLAGF (284K). BLAGF (0) and BONXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BLAGFBONXFBLAGF / BONXF
Capitalization70.9M28M253%
EBITDA-1.08M-8.42M13%
Gain YTD386.927-14.557-2,658%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash284K8.49M3%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLAGF vs BONXF: Fundamental Ratings
BLAGF
BONXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
542
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3677
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BONXF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BLAGF (74). This means that BONXF’s stock grew similarly to BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BONXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BLAGF (100). This means that BONXF’s stock grew similarly to BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BLAGF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as BONXF (97). This means that BLAGF’s stock grew similarly to BONXF’s over the last 12 months.

BLAGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BONXF (77). This means that BLAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BONXF’s over the last 12 months.

BLAGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BONXF (100). This means that BLAGF’s stock grew similarly to BONXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLAGFBONXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLAGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BONXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAIYY0.13N/A
N/A
Aesthetic Medical International Holdings Group Ltd.
BRDCF45.06N/A
N/A
Bridgestone Corp.
CFEIY5.24N/A
N/A
China Feihe Limited
CYFL45.10N/A
N/A
Century Financial Corp.
FMBL7835.00-4.00
-0.05%
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach (CA)

BLAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLAGF and KNTNF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLAGF and KNTNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLAGF
1D Price
Change %
BLAGF100%
+2.24%
KNTNF - BLAGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.13%
DPMLF - BLAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
RRDMF - BLAGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BONXF - BLAGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
BGUUF - BLAGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BONXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BONXF and FNV have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BONXF and FNV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BONXF
1D Price
Change %
BONXF100%
-2.17%
FNV - BONXF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
PAAS - BONXF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
WDOFF - BONXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.96%
OR - BONXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
VGZ - BONXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
More