It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRPD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RPD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BL (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.78% price change this week, while RPD (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.40%.
BL is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
RPD is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
BL | RPD | BL / RPD | |
Capitalization | 3.99B | 3.04B | 131% |
EBITDA | 117M | -39.14M | -299% |
Gain YTD | 3.235 | -31.629 | -10% |
P/E Ratio | 78.96 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 590M | 778M | 76% |
Total Cash | 1.2B | 383M | 314% |
Total Debt | 1.41B | 1.03B | 138% |
BL | RPD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 27 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RPD's Valuation (8) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for BL (83) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that RPD’s stock grew significantly faster than BL’s over the last 12 months.
BL's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as RPD (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to RPD’s over the last 12 months.
BL's SMR Rating (35) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RPD (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that BL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RPD’s over the last 12 months.
BL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as RPD (57) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to RPD’s over the last 12 months.
RPD's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BL (84) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that RPD’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.
BL | RPD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 3 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 3 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 3 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 3 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 3 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago72% | 15 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago72% | 3 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 3 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 3 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BL has been loosely correlated with PD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BL jumps, then PD could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RPD has been loosely correlated with TENB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RPD jumps, then TENB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RPD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RPD | 100% | -0.54% | ||
TENB - RPD | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
SHOP - RPD | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.06% | ||
WK - RPD | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
BL - RPD | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
PD - RPD | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.07% | ||
More |