It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePERF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PERF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BL (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.87% price change this week, while PERF (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.48%.
BL is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
PERF is expected to report earnings on Sep 30, 2022.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
BL | PERF | BL / PERF | |
Capitalization | 3.99B | 293M | 1,362% |
EBITDA | 117M | -186.05M | -63% |
Gain YTD | -3.011 | -40.029 | 8% |
P/E Ratio | 78.96 | 48.20 | 164% |
Revenue | 590M | 50.5M | 1,168% |
Total Cash | 1.2B | 201M | 599% |
Total Debt | 1.41B | 767K | 183,833% |
BL | PERF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PERF's Valuation (60) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BL (82) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PERF’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.
BL's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PERF (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to PERF’s over the last 12 months.
BL's SMR Rating (35) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PERF (85) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PERF’s over the last 12 months.
BL's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PERF (77) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PERF’s over the last 12 months.
BL's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PERF (89) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to PERF’s over the last 12 months.
BL | PERF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago71% | 5 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BL has been loosely correlated with WK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BL jumps, then WK could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that PERF and ULY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PERF and ULY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PERF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PERF | 100% | -0.58% | ||
ULY - PERF | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.42% | ||
BL - PERF | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
MGPPF - PERF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HTCR - PERF | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.58% | ||
NET - PERF | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.37% | ||
More |